BuzzH
Well-known member
Keep it up...you won't have to put up with pro public land idiots on this board for long.
Utah, it's time to oust Mr. Anti-Public lands Mike Lee
- Thread starter Oneye
- Start date
grizzly_
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2013
- Messages
- 1,242
Hey @Oneye, did you ever hear back from either of the challengers? I've been watching this unfold for the last few months when Lee's PAC's starting running attack ads even before the ladies had announced.
I'd like to make a donation but don't know which challenger to throw my support behind so I've been waiting for more info to come out.
I'd like to make a donation but don't know which challenger to throw my support behind so I've been waiting for more info to come out.
Doublecluck
Well-known member
That’s not true, it’s mostly progressives, some liberals, some socialists, a couple marxists and one admitted communist. I’m pretty sure. But I think I missed that thread and am reading between the lines. So get it right dammit.
I’d vote for whichever one is furthest from mitt
Edit:if all else fails just vote for the Mormon one.
Last edited:
Ditchdigger
New member
- Joined
- May 9, 2021
- Messages
- 11
I agree. The cup runneth-over.
R
rwc101
Guest
Carnage2011
Well-known member
You dipshits think Mike Lee is good for hunting? Or public land?
Dipshits and liberals? Which is which? A conundrum for sure. mtmuley
You have been here since 8.17.2015 and you just figured out this is a pro public land forum? Speaks volumes to your IQ.
I typed very slowly so you could follow.
Door is to your right....your other right.
Ditchdigger
New member
- Joined
- May 9, 2021
- Messages
- 11
I think Mr. Lee is a good man, who has his constituents in mind. Why resort to name calling? I wouldn't resort to calling you a sperm berp'en liberal.....ooops.
Hey miller, you are no better than the other side with posts like this. But, it's ok here. mtmuley
Carnage2011
Well-known member
You obviously don’t know me. You stick around and you might find that I’m far from a liberal. I have a pretty open mind and can think for myself. Mr. Lee has his money backers in mind.
D_Walt
Well-known member
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2020
- Messages
- 715
A good case in point about why public land advocacy and outreach are necessary for us DIY public land hunters. The vast majority of the hunters and anglers I know that reside in my state know close to zero about public land and wouldn’t really care one way or the other if a candidate was beating the drum against it.
Public land is nearly nonexistent here in Texas. We have more congressional seats (36) than NM, CO, WY, ID, UT, AZ and NV combined (31). And virtually no voters here give 2
’s about public land. This issue is a critical one to have the right Senators on from the western states.
Hopefully Utah will get a new Senator.
Public land is nearly nonexistent here in Texas. We have more congressional seats (36) than NM, CO, WY, ID, UT, AZ and NV combined (31). And virtually no voters here give 2
’s about public land. This issue is a critical one to have the right Senators on from the western states. Hopefully Utah will get a new Senator.
BuzzH
Well-known member
A response almost as predictable as it is sad.
Living up to the stereotype.
Next will be the faux outrage when you get the boot.
tons of respect for your opinion
I did get one back from Isom, but it was kind of a canned vague auto email response. I’m going to likely call their offices next week if I get no answer. I think Edwards will have the better chance, but Isom is a decent choice as well. Either would be far better than continuing Lee. I replied to Isom one today and asked for a more firm response. Hopefully she or her office will get back with a more firm response. @grizzly_
Last edited:
Mitt is better on public lands than Lee by a long shot. I’d vote for Mitt again any day of the week.
grizzly_
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2013
- Messages
- 1,242
Harry Reid (Dem), Jeff Flake (Rep), Dean Heller (Rep), and Tom Udall (Dem) all retired so that only leaves Romney, Lee, and Crapo.
Jeff Flake is on his way to be Biden's Ambassador to Turkey so he'll be out of the country for a bit.
Considering the breadth of these men's positions, maybe a Senator's religion isn't as good of a predictor as you believe and should be left out of the discussion. That's probably why Article VI of the Constitution directly forbids a religious test to hold office.
Maybe that was an attempt at tongue-in-cheek, but I still feel a person's religion should be left out of a discussion unless absolutely necessary. Just a thought.
Last edited:
Doublecluck
Well-known member
Lol… aren’t they all Mormon?… lol… it was a joke chuck..
I checked the two gals out, don’t like either of em, don’t like Lee, status quo for my feelings on politicians in general. Public lands don’t play very heavy in my opinions, more critical issues as far as I’m concerned.. carry on though, I like watching a witch burn just as much as the next guy.
grizzly_
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2013
- Messages
- 1,242
Gotcha. There have been several threads on here that have turned into religious discussions that shouldn't have been so I was jumping in ahead of it. The funny thing is, I'm not even Mormon... I just think we can focus on issues without bringing beliefs into it.
Point taken on the fact that Lee and Romney share the same religion though
Similar threads
