Irrelevant
Well-known member
Yep, which is why I make my geopolitical opinions based on a google search and not some dudes on a hunting forum.Isn't that what this is...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yep, which is why I make my geopolitical opinions based on a google search and not some dudes on a hunting forum.Isn't that what this is...
The person who uses Google and reads a little certainly knows more than the person who chooses not to on subjects they know nothing about but want to act like they do. It would be pretty hard for someone knowledgeable about any subject to hide under an alias here. The hunt talk fact-check committee is pretty solid.It only matters when people imply they know more and others are lazy because.....google.
When using google and trusting the algorithm results is the epitome of being lazy and malleable.
You have an answer for everything.How many of the people currently unemployed would be employable in the semiconductor industry?
Ah yes, Dr. Google, LOLOLOLYep, which is why I make my geopolitical opinions based on a google search and not some dudes on a hunting forum.
quick comparison, I guess I'd heard of DDG but kinda forgot about it.DuckDuckGo is a legitimately less advertising-biased search engine. I haven't used Google in two years and haven't missed it.
Yup that why I said less advertising-biased and not less biased. All algorithms are inherently biased by the designer, user feedback (what gets clicked, what doesn’t, web page keyword by web host, etc) and by “proof sets” used to develop and maintain.DDG is a bit better for privacy. Not so much for providing "unbiased" results. Taking the title of this thread, both provide links to CNCBC and CNN as the top three results for "Ukraine Russia" searches. Google provides links to AP and the BBC to round out the top 5. DDG serves up The Guardian and Yahoo.
Yup that why I said less advertising-biased and not less biased. All algorithms are inherently biased by the designer, user feedback (what gets clicked, what doesn’t, web page keyword by web host, etc) and by “proof sets” used to develop and maintain.
I just like not getting all the top ad results being Chevy listings for a week after a buddy sends a supposedly private “time for a new car” email. I dropped Gmail and all other Google and Facebook products including google maps (except YouTube). The only thing I miss is google maps (Apple Maps suffices, but is far short. I never found a legit substitute for YouTube but did create an alias “spam email” account to sign in with to make a bit harder for them to track (but of course they still can with other browser bread crumbs/data).
I tried going anti-google. It just made my life a little more difficult, very minor, but annoying nonetheless, and I went back. I made a hard push for Firefox instead of chrome, but those fractions of a second longer, added up, I get the product their pushing is integration, all-in-one, and honestly, I prefer that, it is simpler, and for that I guess I'm willing to see whatever ad they want me to. I'm still not clicking on it.Yup that why I said less advertising-biased and not less biased. All algorithms are inherently biased by the designer, user feedback (what gets clicked, what doesn’t, web page keyword by web host, etc) and by “proof sets” used to develop and maintain.
I just like not getting all the top ad results being Chevy listings for a week after a buddy sends a supposedly private “time for a new car” email. I dropped Gmail and all other Google and Facebook products including google maps (except YouTube). The only thing I miss is google maps (Apple Maps suffices, but is far short. I never found a legit substitute for YouTube but did create an alias “spam email” account to sign in with to make a bit harder for them to track (but of course they still can with other browser bread crumbs/data).
It's less about an ad I can ignore, it is about the complete life profile they are generating behind the scenes and what they do or may do with that. At least I strongly encourage folks to drop GMAIL - it is absurd how much they learn by "reading" every email you send and receive. I feel similarly about Android phones in general.I tried going anti-google. It just made my life a little more difficult, very minor, but annoying nonetheless, and I went back. I made a hard push for Firefox instead of chrome, but those fractions of a second longer, added up, I get the product their pushing is integration, all-in-one, and honestly, I prefer that, it is simpler, and for that I guess I'm willing to see whatever ad they want me to. I'm still not clicking on it.
Like? I've never been able to quantify what actual impairments on my life could come from Alphabet "knowing all about me"It's less about an ad I can ignore, it is about the complete life profile they are generating behind the scenes and what they do or may do with that.
So, you have financial docs emailed to you and your nosy brother-in-law who is a server admin at google takes a look. They can’t do encryption at rest like better email providers because they need to read it to push their ads so thousands of employees and contractors can access your stuff. Or they take personal emails that may indicate financial stresses and you get flagged on a future googleFICO product? FBI getting a loose judge to give subpoena list of folks googling a politician before an attack on that politician and you are now on a person of interest list even though you were just curious about their trip. Some of your email exchanges with a friend suggest you have honest concerns about vaccines and the search engine skews all your inquiries towards anti-vaxxer sites and you don’t get needed vaccines for your kids. Internet companies become “mandatory reporters” and out of context emails or searches are flagged for referral. And on and on.Like? I've never been able to quantify what actual impairments on my life could come from Alphabet "knowing all about me"