U.S. says it will cut costs for clean energy projects on public lands

oh yeah, they are all over that in Iowa (cheap energy, corporate welfare, etc.). New centers for "mining" are poppinng up and chewing up ungodly amounts of e. Whatever. Not going to change the fate of the planet. It's bad. Way bad.
 
OG development will still be there, regardless. Hundreds of thousands of wells will not disappear overnight because Nuke plants got built. I sure as hell hope the strategy to move away from fossil fuels is not forcing $10 per gallon gasoline on people either. Because we'll all be broke by the time new energy solutions spread their wings and become globally adopted by common people. Like many things, progress is typically slow and incremental.
I mean also if the government built nuclear reactors and replaced oil burning power plants that would reduce prices at the pump.
 
I mean also if the government built nuclear reactors and replaced oil burning power plants that would reduce prices at the pump.
Most (all?) oil burners have been converted to LNG, no? Doesn't appear to have done much to the cost of gas from what I can see. But perhaps that is disguised in some way.
 
I'm interested in mixing in some nitrogen fixing, bloat free sainfoin with the grass and see how good the beef gets. Bees like it too.

If you haven’t read Salad Bar Beef by Joel Salatin you should seek it out.

He’s a bit of a hippie dippy nut job, but still good stuff back by practice not theory.
 
Most (all?) oil burners have been converted to LNG, no? Doesn't appear to have done much to the cost of gas from what I can see. But perhaps that is disguised in some way.
Most… though still quite a primary source is a couple of markets.


I think it’s kinda to your point about ever increasing energy use… what’s crazy is that even though the US energy mix has changed in the last 30 years a ton… way more renewables, the amount of fossil fuels we use has only increased, there has been absolutely no “replacement”.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Not a rancher, but yes. We mob graze our ladies. We don't necessarily do it for the carbon sequestration benefit, that's a side piece. We do it because it had massive effects on our pasture health, and our weaning weights climbed because of it.
Good friend of mines dad mob grazes. The pasture benefits are pretty impressive.
 
What about removing shareholders from the equation? Force all Nuke plants to be private companies who are not on the hook for keeping your 401k on the up and up. I could be wrong, but I think this could remove some of the profit motive problems we see
Private companies try to make a profit too. They just don’t have to do the reporting to make the SEC happy. There is still someone behind them providing capital and that capital needs to make a return. This isn’t the case with a lot of the money the government spends, which means a both good and bad.
 
I think it’s kinda to your point about ever increasing energy use… what’s crazy is that even though the US energy mix has changed in the last 30 years a ton… way more renewables, the amount of fossil fuels we use has only increased, there has been absolutely no “replacement”.
The reality is there is no easy answer. Each one is like the drugs that advertise on the evening news where side effects include suicide, stroke, heart attack and death. The only solution right now is “all of the above” and pray for some smart people who went to college and decided to geek out on this stuff instead of going for a big paycheck to start tweaking some of them to make them palatable for the long term.
 
Caribou Gear

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
113,671
Messages
2,029,128
Members
36,277
Latest member
rt3bulldogs
Back
Top