Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Non-residents would?Those eastern guys can't scout as much as Greenhorn and if they are going to pay a high price for an out of state tag, I guess they are happy to pay the trespass fee for a good place.
Some locals would rather that didn't happen, I guess, ,
Um, no shit. I am guessing pretty close to 100% of the public would concur. BTW, if I am a "you people" who else would than include?You people want to scout and pay cheap fees for tags,
So if a person pays more money, he/she is entitled to better opportunities? That Texas must be a wonderful state.Those easterners don't want to compete with the public, I guess, they want an advantage for a higher tag fee.
mtmiller said:Sorry Tom, but I just had two glasses of wine. Maybe that is why I have no flippin' idea what you just said.
Elkgunner said:I think you will find most of us who hunt out west (and live here) pretty protective of our public land hunts, and a 150 buck on Public Lands is WAAAAAAY better to me than a 205 buck behind a fence on somebody's pasture.
Kinda, gotta get my hand drunk.mtmiller, wine??? You got a chick over there or something?
Probably not, but I can tell you where you won't see me.We'll see what you're hunting when you get to the 70s, maybe.
Wow, we have some oil wells here in MT as well, so we must be just like Texas. True, there are leses here in MT, but I would not compare that to what is in Texas. Would you agree?mtmiller, I guess I'm bascally saying you have the value in Montana that you want to stay in Texas. Don't be blind to it there. Those guys leased for $20,000 in Montana. Don't think its just in Texas, its there in Montana too.
So in theory, those paying less are seeking less?I'm saying they seek more, for paying more,
So that must mean...time out, what the hell is the point of that statement. Maybe you jumped to another thread there. I don't see the relavence in this discussion anyway (oh well, nice filler). I guess if they charged more for those NR tags you would see more "deserving" hunters.Texas has $6 over the counter tags for children. Out of state people pay the same animal fee as in state people for most of the animals here. You're blind to things like that.
Apparently if I had more disposable income I would be a better, sorry "more of a hunter". |ooThe guys who paid $5000 and hunted that ranch, were probably more of a hunter,
Oh yeh, the kettle called; your black.I don't think you people, some of you, know what you're talking about,
If this is a cost to meat ratio, might as well shoot one of those herefords behind the fence. Same kind of hunt as far as I can tell. True I have not taken one, so I will have to guess.I guess he could have gone to Montana and shot a prairie dog or something instead of either of those hunts where I was with him, but it would have cost him a lot more and took a lot longer and it wouldn't eat as well.
Finally, something we agree on. I agree, landowners deserve something for hosting all public hunters, but not just "rich public hunters".Your public block management program even recognizes the landowner deserves something for hosting public hunters.
Wait until I am done for gosh sakes.It's like going over to Bill Rancher and asking him, how much to shoot that Heffer standing over in the back corner of your property?
Talk about a budget fluctuating year to year.Residents ought to pay the proportion of their state wildlife budget that they harvest, at least.
Disagree, the Federal land is open to everyone for the same price, doesn't matter if you are from Texas or Montana. Now if you want to put a price on the critters out there, they belong to the State, therefore there is no Federal issue here.Maybe, just everyone pay a trespass fee, to the feds., the same whether you're in state or out of state. That's fair, you agree?
Sorry you feel that way. Have you found anyone yet that agrees with opinions you have posted. I have yet to see anyone come to your defense as of yet.I don't agree with most of your ignorant conclusions about places you have not been and not seen and not hunted.
I guess Websters also disagrees with you. HOG--Any of various mammals of the family Suidae, which includes the domesticated pig as well as wild species, such as the boar and the wart hog. A domesticated pig, especially one weighing over 54 kilograms (120 pounds).We don't call them pigs, you guys do. A pig is on a farm. A hog is out in the woods.
Man are you in left field. Do you even understand the meaning?I'm not calling your kettle black, I'm saying you can't see the kettle.
Other than the subtle difference that there are no high fences and the animals still belong to and are managed by the state.The Montana lease is no different than the Texas lease.
You can do whatever you want on federal land, hunting licenses are specific to the big game animals, not the land you are on. Cornfusing I know. By the way, if it's a rip off, go to the game farm.. much better deal eh?Hey, I'm kind of pissed about the federal bill stating a state can charge a non-resident as high a price as they want for hunting on our federal land, supported by our excise taxes. That's a black kettle there. Its a major rip off. I think the residents should pay a higher share of their own wildlife management than is occuring now in lots of states. At least the poacher residents for sure.