What's on your list? Why is a weapon referred to as "assault" type? mtmuleyI think there should be some reasonable limitations on ownership and employment of "assault" type weapons.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What's on your list? Why is a weapon referred to as "assault" type? mtmuleyI think there should be some reasonable limitations on ownership and employment of "assault" type weapons.
who is putting anti hunting initiatives on the slate? Which party? Which Party is pushing for gun control?
I do.Do you consider banning bump stocks a form of gun control?
I do not support any laws that punish the innocent to provide protection from the crazy
almost all my friends have bump stocks or some type of trigger spring attachment to help shoot faster if they wanna play at the range or on the farm. So yes banning them is a form of gun control. Keeping or limiting good guys owning anytype of gun is gun control or attachments to a gun.Do you consider banning bump stocks a form of gun control?
Generally speaking, the weapon which not long ago was employed almost exclusively by the military or law enforcement. AR's, AK's, and others became a trendy rage and were subsequently produced and marketed widely. Unfortunately my perspective and obviously a broader bias by gun control advocates is that those weapons are misused and displayed by militant wanna-be's and others who are less than respectable appearing citizens. Having said that, I fully realize that many responsible and safe gun owners use them for recreational target shooting and for hunting appropriately. However, it's the irresponsible gunners shooting rapidly, felling trees, otherwise just intent on blowing stuff up, disturbing others, appearing threateningly defiant, and projecting a bad image of gun owners who are at the forefront and have become the stereotype. IMO, they are more detrimental to upholding my Second Amendment rights than even the gun control advocates.What's on your list? Why is a weapon referred to as "assault" type? mtmuley
Straight Arrow, thanks for your service to our country! 30 years very big thank you!!!. I am not very happy with the NRA. I recently let my membership expire.You sure about that? Her shotgun is a semi. I have not heard or seen anything regarding AR's from her, but it would not surprise me.
Not trying to get you upset, but as explained previously, as a thirty year military guy, I think there should be some reasonable limitations on ownership and employment of "assault" type weapons.
Please redirect any animosity toward me in a more positive direction supporting your beloved NRA.
almost all my friends have bump stocks or some type of trigger spring attachment to help shoot faster if they wanna play at the range or on the farm. So yes banning them is a form of gun control. Keeping or limiting good guys owning anytype of gun is gun control or attachments to a gun.
what soon if we call a gun a long range rifle it will be limited or need to be controlled to keep the left happy
I disagree, but I understand where you are coming from. I don't own any of those types of rifles, and have no desire to. But I don't support restricting ownership or availability of them. mtmuleyGenerally speaking, the weapon which not long ago was employed almost exclusively by the military or law enforcement. AR's, AK's, and others became a trendy rage and were subsequently produced and marketed widely. Unfortunately my perspective and obviously a broader bias by gun control advocates is that those weapons are misused and displayed by militant wanna-be's and others who are less than respectable appearing citizens. Having said that, I fully realize that many responsible and safe gun owners use them for recreational target shooting and for hunting appropriately. However, it's the irresponsible gunners shooting rapidly, felling trees, otherwise just intent on blowing stuff up, disturbing others, appearing threateningly defiant, and projecting a bad image of gun owners who are at the forefront and have become the stereotype. IMO, they are more detrimental to upholding my Second Amendment rights than even the gun control advocates.
The additional critical reality for me is that there are so many, perhaps even the majority, of voting citizens who are "on the fence" regarding the gun control issues and potential new regulations, but can be pushed off the fence onto the wrong side (unreasonable gun controls) by the nimrods irresponsibly employing "assault" weapons.
For full disclosure, my son owns an AR-15 and he and my grandson shoot it and think it's pretty "cool". Much to my chagrin, the grandson "plays" with one in many video killing games, of which this old curmudgeon also disapproves. However, my point to them is, "You don't hunt with it, you don't really even shoot it that much, so it's a frivolous waste of your time, money, and gun safe space ... you don't need it! Be cool some more constructive way."
when it comes to guns>>>> its super offensive to hear someone say " you don't need that type of gun" Im just saying Im not offended by your comment because I totally see it. I'll tell you what is next>> you don't need that truck> You don't need that size house> You don't need that meat in your freezer >> you don't need to go to church >>> you don't need to go hunting >> you don't need to hunt that animal>>> etc etc etc etcGenerally speaking, the weapon which not long ago was employed almost exclusively by the military or law enforcement. AR's, AK's, and others became a trendy rage and were subsequently produced and marketed widely. Unfortunately my perspective and obviously a broader bias by gun control advocates is that those weapons are misused and displayed by militant wanna-be's and others who are less than respectable appearing citizens. Having said that, I fully realize that many responsible and safe gun owners use them for recreational target shooting and for hunting appropriately. However, it's the irresponsible gunners shooting rapidly, felling trees, otherwise just intent on blowing stuff up, disturbing others, appearing threateningly defiant, and projecting a bad image of gun owners who are at the forefront and have become the stereotype. IMO, they are more detrimental to upholding my Second Amendment rights than even the gun control advocates.
The additional critical reality for me is that there are so many, perhaps even the majority, of voting citizens who are "on the fence" regarding the gun control issues and potential new regulations, but can be pushed off the fence onto the wrong side (unreasonable gun controls) by the nimrods irresponsibly employing "assault" weapons.
For full disclosure, my son owns an AR-15 and he and my grandson shoot it and think it's pretty "cool". Much to my chagrin, the grandson "plays" with one in many video killing games, of which this old curmudgeon also disapproves. However, my point to them is, "You don't hunt with it, you don't really even shoot it that much, so it's a frivolous waste of your time, money, and gun safe space ... you don't need it! Be cool some more constructive way."
Im not familiar with it, but most likely yes by my definitionSo Trumps bump stock regulation is a form of gun control?
How about we get the thread back on track - what should us hunters be doing to protect our hunting heritage?
How about we get the thread back on track - what should us hunters be doing to protect our hunting heritage?
almost all my friends have bump stocks or some type of trigger spring attachment to help shoot faster if they wanna play at the range or on the farm. So yes banning them is a form of gun control. Keeping or limiting good guys owning anytype of gun is gun control or attachments to a gun.
what soon if we call a gun a long range rifle it will be limited or need to be controlled to keep the left happy
I do not support speed limit restrictions. I obey them but I do not support them.that leaves a lot to interpretation. A speed limit would fit this definition by some peoples' opinions.
seems like our friends have very similar occupations just different choice of guns but I have friends who don't own black guns also, really not sure what the purely hunter means?Hmmm....
None of my friends have bump stocks nor some type of trigger spring attachment to help shoot faster......
I and all of my friends are purely hunters. I have absolutely no use for a toy like an AR. Neither do my friends. In fact, my Western Public Land hunter friends and I quite often discuss the net negative the AR culture has on the things we hold the dearest. But then again, without the things we hold dearest, our firearms would be of no use to us.
But like I said, that's me and my friends. Most of us have a butt load of firearms, a bunch of mounts around the house, and the average span of our Public Lands hunting careers is probably around 40 some years.
Just a bunch of liberal snowflakes we are - a retired truck driver, a plumber, a cop, a couple retired fish and wildlife biologists, a game warden, a day trader........
And I, a retired state fish and wildlife tech who has (likely) ended the lives of more critters than any member on this forum - yeah I'm a real hardcore liberal......................................
We and the friends we run with are an interesting illustration of the wide gulf which exists in the world of the American hunter(s).
I laugh(nervously) at people who proclaim "hunters have to stick together". They (which is a word those proclaim such things seem to like) should wake up - we are a vastly differing bunch. And that gulf is expanding.
Wonder how the whole thing will shake out................................................
makes no difference if they need I or not . since when are we a nation that limits ourselves to what we need????????? they want it and it is their right to own it. the constitution, which is the supreme law of our nation guarantees that right, wether others agree with it or not.Generally speaking, the weapon which not long ago was employed almost exclusively by the military or law enforcement. AR's, AK's, and others became a trendy rage and were subsequently produced and marketed widely. Unfortunately my perspective and obviously a broader bias by gun control advocates is that those weapons are misused and displayed by militant wanna-be's and others who are less than respectable appearing citizens. Having said that, I fully realize that many responsible and safe gun owners use them for recreational target shooting and for hunting appropriately. However, it's the irresponsible gunners shooting rapidly, felling trees, otherwise just intent on blowing stuff up, disturbing others, appearing threateningly defiant, and projecting a bad image of gun owners who are at the forefront and have become the stereotype. IMO, they are more detrimental to upholding my Second Amendment rights than even the gun control advocates.
The additional critical reality for me is that there are so many, perhaps even the majority, of voting citizens who are "on the fence" regarding the gun control issues and potential new regulations, but can be pushed off the fence onto the wrong side (unreasonable gun controls) by the nimrods irresponsibly employing "assault" weapons.
For full disclosure, my son owns an AR-15 and he and my grandson shoot it and think it's pretty "cool". Much to my chagrin, the grandson "plays" with one in many video killing games, of which this old curmudgeon also disapproves. However, my point to them is, "You don't hunt with it, you don't really even shoot it that much, so it's a frivolous waste of your time, money, and gun safe space ... you don't need it! Be cool some more constructive way."