They’ve stymied outward growth, but they’ve also stymied upward growth.
The result is that the outward growth jumps the “green belt” and happens in the surrounding towns like Louisville, Longmont, Lafayette, and Erie, and those people still drive into Boulder to work, dine, etc. Not really an improvement IMO.
In the face of growth, shutting your doors and saying “we’re closed” only pushes it elsewhere so the sprawl monster can consume yet another open space and poop out a subdivision.
Boulder’s ethos is no different than most communities: “not in my backyard!”. They just happen to be much better it.
Yes. It’s nice if you live there (I did for a while), but the prevailing attitude towards development only fuels the suburban hellscape devouring the Front Range.
i mean yes and no. you're not wrong, it does jump the green belt due to that. but i still don't see it as that simple.
I don't think Boulder's policies are the reason Erie is blowing up. First and foremost Erie is blowing up because of Erie's policies. Most of Erie doesn't even reside within Boulder County, it's Weld County. Erie has quite the hunger for growth (I'm actually having a house built in Erie as we type).
the root of it all is that people are moving here. sprawling new homes in longmont and erie has nothing to do with boulder. it has everything to do with the demand for homes. i think it's a damn good thing that boulder is preserving that open space in the midst of the development chaos surrounding it.
so i mean... what's your point? that it would it be better for Boulder to convert all of their many open spaces to small-lot single family homes instead? the people will move here, and the homes will be built. that part is inevitable. I'm not gonna vilify boulder in any way for sticking to their guns.
Last edited: