SAJ-99
Well-known member
So we know your team.Reasonable third person = Cheney
Now that’s funny
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So we know your team.Reasonable third person = Cheney
Now that’s funny
Not directed personally at you SAJ. But this is the only thing keeping all of us from winning. Growing so tired of it.So we know your team.
Seriously, if you honestly think the name Cheney is reasonable you only see what you want. Look who she learned from, good grief.So we know your team.
Completely agree, but it's our fault. It isn't about ideas or policies or "values" (WTF that is), it's about standing behind the team. And that makes a third party candidate almost impossible. Cheney was viewed as as republican as they come. She voted with Trump over 90% of the time. Then she became anti-Trump. It's funny how the right turned against her, but it shows what the Republican party has become. Manchin had my attention for a hot minute, but he saw the reality of it all too. A candidate has to appeased the extremes to move through the system as structured.Not directed personally at you SAJ. But this is the only thing keeping all of us from winning. Growing so tired of it.
Change your mind about what?Completely agree, but it's our fault. It isn't about ideas or policies or "values" (WTF that is), it's about standing behind the team. And that makes a third party candidate almost impossible. Cheney was viewed as as republican as they come. She voted with Trump over 90% of the time. Then she became anti-Trump. It's funny how the right turned against her, but it shows what the Republican party has become. Manchin had my attention for a hot minute, but he saw the reality of it all too. A candidate has to appeased the extremes to move through the system as structured.
@Bullbrl, all talk no data. Change my mind.
That's my point, time to change how it's structured.Completely agree, but it's our fault. It isn't about ideas or policies or "values" (WTF that is), it's about standing behind the team. And that makes a third party candidate almost impossible. Cheney was viewed as as republican as they come. She voted with Trump over 90% of the time. Then she became anti-Trump. It's funny how the right turned against her, but it shows what the Republican party has become. Manchin had my attention for a hot minute, but he saw the reality of it all too. A candidate has to appeased the extremes to move through the system as structured.
@Bullbrl, all talk no data. Change my mind.
Please don’t imply that the the Dems embody righteous superiority by default. Trump would not have been possible without Hillary being crammed down our throats. It was the perfect storm of arrogance.Completely agree, but it's our fault. It isn't about ideas or policies or "values" (WTF that is), it's about standing behind the team. And that makes a third party candidate almost impossible. Cheney was viewed as as republican as they come. She voted with Trump over 90% of the time. Then she became anti-Trump. It's funny how the right turned against her, but it shows what the Republican party has become. Manchin had my attention for a hot minute, but he saw the reality of it all too. A candidate has to appeased the extremes to move through the system as structured.
@Bullbrl, all talk no data. Change my mind.
You read a lot into that statement. I implied no such thing. Every candidate gets crammed down our throats. Hillary was a flawed candidate. By the same measure, Trump is a flawed candidate, Biden is a flawed candidate. The majority hates both of them to varying degrees. I'm not sure they is a single candidate to get us out of this mess. A split ticket? Not sure who the candidates would be and to get peoples attention you would have to convince them the VP is going to be delegated some power that the position doesn't normally have. Given the parties themselves are interested in keeping some level of relevance and the system is set up to keep them in place, changing it isn't easy.Please don’t imply that the the Dems embody righteous superiority by default. Trump would not have been possible without Hillary being crammed down our throats. It was the perfect storm of arrogance.
Yes, but there is something to be said for Pelosi keeping the house in line and not letting some far-left wack jobs control the agenda. Slightly different than what we see today.Btw, no party tows the line like the Dems.
I agree. Nothing worth doing hardly ever is.Given the parties themselves are interesting in keeping some level of relevance and the system is set up to keep them in place, changing it isn't easy.
Adding $100 trillion every 100 days right now.
I can agree to a point but Pelosi, while I think she’s a corrupt drunk, only kept them in line when it suited her. You only have to look at “the squad” to see what I mean. She let them run loose and it wasn’t until they started aligning with Palestine that their voice has become tempered.Yes, but there is something to be said for Pelosi keeping the house in line and not letting some far-left wack jobs control the agenda. Slightly different than what we see today.
Arresting and courts are the new normal, unless your’re a criminal or illegal.Arresting the gold star dad is disgusting.
Manchin isn't running. I thought he may be viable.No hope for the third guy?
Was referring to Keneddy.Manchin isn't running. I thought he may be viable.
From yesterday, news on No Labels party:
Third-party movement No Labels says it will field a 2024 presidential ticket
The third-party presidential movement No Labels has decided to field a presidential candidate in the 2024 election.apnews.com
Sure, he may be a fourth option if No Labels puts someone upWas referring to Keneddy.