SaskHunter
Well-known member
How did you draw that conclusion?
Matt painted BHA as an "r3" focused org.
Curious if you listened to the whole podcast? They both repeated numerous times their overall support for the org and raised their discontent towards R3 being a big part of BHA in comparison to other agenda items like conservation and access.
Both are members of BHA, so I believe it's pretty fair for them to challenge or question the org's focus.
Part of the podcast had a piece about how Matt was prevented from asking the membership how they felt about adding more hunters on the landscape, in essence questioning the members on recruitment, and was shut down.
@Elky Welky I wouldn't go as far as saying they smeared the org. They talked about their discontent towards BHA's stance on R3. They also said a lot of good about the org and I beleive it would be unfair to focus only on certain negative parts of the podcast.
I 100% agree with you that their "pint nights" counting as R3 is pushing it.