Solving Point Creep

I do think the system is forcing people out. I think I'm about to become one. Certainly, for many species I am forced out already. But now the more common elk and mule deer are becoming just no longer feasible.

What states are you putting in for elk and deer that you can't draw?
 
As long as the supply and demand curves maintain their trajectories, there will be no true “solution“. More people are interested in a resource than there is resource to go around. You can go around about the best way to split it up, but at the end of the day your personal chance comes up less often. If people aren’t convinced to bow out via cost or wait list length, it will continue to get worse.

The Randy’s were spot on, but used less words than I did.
 
You can hunt deer and pronghorn every year. Elk in some cases as well, but every other for certain.
 
Can't you get a general WY license fairly easily? Or Idaho and Montana? Colorado?

Depends on what kinds of areas you are willing to hunt, of course. But a decent area, is getting very hard. And the point creep last year was 2x faster than the possible point accumulation rate for the mediocre (or worse according to some here) area we were hoping for. If that keeps up, simply waiting and buying more points will not, cannot, work. Sure, we could settle for cow hunts and leftover tags or whatever, but that really isn't the sort of hunting we had in mind.

Other states are certainly possible maybe, but I wonder if it really any different in MT. They also add more distance and an extra day driving each way is 2 days lost from hunting. I guess lots of people have the time. I don't. I love to drive, but I'm paying thousands to hunt, not drive. I am not expecting to hunt 2-3 elk per year or even elk every year, but when it starts to look like once in a decade or more... Maybe I should take up golf.

Certainly, it is not impossible, but it is getting much closer to it. The window is about closed on elk after our accumulated points are gone. Probably one more mule deer hunt - we drew last year so we are back to zero pints at the moment. Pronghorn are hanging in there sorta, but already we are looking at downgrading our hunts to much less desirable areas.

Things like sheep, goats, and moose outside of Alaska, are pretty much impossible. Does make spring black bears more interesting though. So perhaps that will remain doable for a while yet.

There are birds, squirrels, and other things to pursue, but big game, not so much and less and less every year. I have no doubt that other folks as old as me (low 60s) and many (not all) younger people wanting to start, just aren't going to invest in something like big game hunting.

The good news - maybe residents will get more tags?

Until tomorrow, I can keep dreaming that point creep will reverse this year and we will get lucky. Another 24 hours of fooling myself.
 
If Wyoming published the point pools for each unit each year then folks could see more accurately where they stand. The information is available but is not on the website because if it were on the website a potential applicant could see that some situations are hopeless. TopRut and Gohunt both publish some of this information. Just looking at 2017 was an eye opener for me.
 
Last edited:
Should have planned ahead? As if one could know what one wants to do, or WILL BE ABLE to do, 15 yrs ahead. Hell, a goodly number of us will be DEAD by then. Not to mention, there is simply no guarantee that one can catch up to point creep in that amount of time. And then there is the cost of those points as well.

I do think the system is forcing people out. I think I'm about to become one. Certainly, for many species I am forced out already. But now the more common elk and mule deer are becoming just no longer feasible.

The alternative is a straight lottery, which is even worse for planning and means that you could go your entire life without drawing were as with pref points you know if you live long enough you will eventually draw. There are trade offs to every system. Also couldn't disagree more with the elk/deer comment, sure it might be harder to find a 170+ mule deer or a 320+ bull in general/OTC units but you can absolute hunt every year/every other and find good animals in a couple of different states. I've yet to draw a tag that required more than 1 pt and have hunted a bunch of tags every year.
 
It's ten hours from Casper to Challis. If that is enough to make it a once in a decade hunt, so be it. We all have our priorities and make our choices accordingly.

I for one never entered the point game when I should have. I lived in MT at the time, so I didn't see the need nor did I have the money. Now I have the need and the money, and no points. Be creative and rethink your parameters, or roll with the status quo.
 
Thanks Greenhorn. You restored my faith and hit my prediction spot on.
Sorry, I could hear the violins playing in the background.
I have no doubt that other folks as old as me (low 60s) and many (not all) younger people wanting to start, just aren't going to invest in something like big game hunting.
The good news - maybe residents will get more tags?
Although facts seem to contradict your comments, I'm sure there are great things other than hunting you'll find to enjoy.

Good luck in the draw tomorrow (or today). I'm in too, 13 points, I hope you draw instead of me. It would be a treacherous 3hr drive to where I applied to hunt.
 
I hope my 13 points disappear tomorrow as well. I didn't affect the point creep.
 
I don't like when the rules and systems change after the program has started. IE; Colorado removed ranching for wildlife from NR & cut the NR allocation % of NR after the system started. Now there are folks talking about trying to change the WYOMING system to not allow Pt averaging on group apps. A few of my friends started building Pts in wyoming when their children were small with the sole reason of doing a good/better hunt with them when they were older or after college. I have an open mind and I appreciate people who give their time to make things better. However, everything is cause and effect somewhere & someway when the deal changes after it started it just seems less fair to the people who play by the rules. I know they care about wildlife management and habitat but if they are spending their time changing a very good system less time is spent on what really matters.
 
I wonder what would happen if my 22 AZ elk points vanished also, along with my 21 Utah points. Would be terrible. I'm not too worried. Point creep gets me every time. I haven't hunted out of state for elk in 20 years. That drive to southern NM did me in last time.
 
I wonder what would happen if my 22 AZ elk points vanished also, along with my 21 Utah points. Would be terrible. I'm not too worried. Point creep gets me every time. I haven't hunted out of state for elk in 20 years. That drive to southern NM did me in last time.

Gotta get in the right mindset to handle the long drives. A few years ago I made the long drive 3 times in one year and did it twice this year
 
You could fairly end the point system by discontinuing the sale of points and allowing those points on the books to be used up. Its fair and in about a dozen years the point system has been flushed out.
 
Allow point holders to gift, devise, or sell their points. I would gladly sell my accumulated points at the going-market rate and buy a “private” hunt in Alaska or Africa with the proceeds. One could argue its a selfish concept, but I would counter that its simple capitalism and free-markets.Who owns the accumulated points - the State or the pointholder?
 
What do you suppose the going rate for Wyoming elk points might be? Or Sheep points anywhere?

It would really increase the number of points being bought every year if they could be flipped for even a small profit.
 
Gastro Gnome - Eat Better Wherever

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
113,668
Messages
2,028,975
Members
36,275
Latest member
johnw3474
Back
Top