Ultrahunter
Active member
What's the difference in assuming there were two or assuming that there were more than that.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So Ultrahunter, you are standing behind the idea that it was two wolves that killed the two elk? Is that your final answer? Do you think that it is more likely these elk were killed by more than two wolves?Ultrahunter said:What's the difference in assuming there were two or assuming that there were more than that.
Heck as long as we are playing the assumption game I will go with the "assumption" that these elk were first run off the winter range by some guys on quads. Luckily they made it to a deep snow area where the quads couldn't push them any further. Unfortunately, these big meanies on sleds, maybe 50 of them, ran these poor elk over and over until their guts were exposed and their heads were opened up.Ultrahunter said:What's the difference in assuming there were two or assuming that there were more than that.