Just a personal preference, but I'd look a a 3-9X40 vs a 4.5-14 for the scope. Generally better eye relief and eye box. IMO, 9X is more than adequate for big game.
x2 ^
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Just a personal preference, but I'd look a a 3-9X40 vs a 4.5-14 for the scope. Generally better eye relief and eye box. IMO, 9X is more than adequate for big game.
I'm still debating on the scope I plan to buy, but I'm looking at up to $200.00 for glass. I'm thinking about the Leopold VX1 in 4-12x40, I like a simple reticle with the least amount of clutter.
I will agree with others. In that price range, 3-9x is plenty of magnification. I've shot prairie dogs at 350-400yds with 9x magnification. At that price level, I'd rather trade better glass with lower magnification. For most hunting situations 6x is Really enough. There was an old adage that you should have 1x magnification for every 100yds you plan to shoot. I like a bit more, about 2x/100yds. If you are interested in a Leupold you should talk to Schmalts. He will hook you up.
Probably work well on sasquatch too.