D
Deleted member 28227
Guest
That just sounds like a miserable existence to me… no way I’d want to retire at 40 or whatever.I think that is what was very eye opening to me about the FIRE movement was the notion of frugality (notice I didn't say being cheap) and it's impact on your savings vs spending rate. There are frequent writeups in the FIRE community about Average Joe &Jill who are both public school teachers each making $50k/year who were able to live (and live comfortably) on only 1/2 their income (and invest the other half in low-cost index funds) and be retired after 15 years. It doesn't take ramen noodle style living, rather choices about housing, transportation, and food that end up eating away at our income when the majority of those things are wants, rather than needs.
It's an analysis of whether or not a newer car(or 2), more expensive house, or eating out for multiple meals per week creates greater happiness in your life over the opportunity to be required to work less at your job.
It isn't rooted in the notion of "you millennials need to give up your Starbucks because that is what's making you poor". Just the idea that all purchase decisions are small, but cumulative, impacts on our ability to creat wealth.
For just a basic thought exercise, a $5 coffee 5x per week everyday on your way into the job, everyday for 30 years could have become $225,000 had it been invested in a low fee index fund. That's the ability to withdraw $10,000 per year in perpetuity. Not ramen noodle type changes. Rather a decision on what is more important, this purchase or my freedom from forced work.