seeth07
Well-known member
No, just thru tomorrow. Work Monday and Tuesday for both of us and then the wife will be back up for 7 days straight if needed. I'll just have friday night, sat and Sunday next weekend
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Best to wait for the late bait season every other year. That last week can be golden. Finding unpressured bear can be tough.Hard for me to really wrap this up with how angry I am but basically IT SUCKED. I no longer am a supporter of the way WI structures it seasons and the rules and regulations around using hounds for hunting black bears. I now feel that it is completely out of hand and outrageous what happens drawn from conclusions made by my own personal firsthand knowledge and experience.
And I'm a huge dog lover, especially in regards to using dogs for hunting - I have two golden retrievers trained as upland and waterfowl dogs.
I'm guessing the area you run has a lot of public land? This specific area does not. The closest reasonable tract of public land (more than 200 acres) to run the dogs is about 15 miles away.As a WI hound hunter, I'm sad to hear about your season. @thusby is right about taking advantage of the week that hounds aren't in the woods. I too would suggest the years where sitting bait is the late season, like he did (although it looks like the first week could have been very productive had you been available). My main takeaway from your stats, is that you have some shitty outfitters in your area. I would report those guys to the DNR if it were me. Outfitters need to be held to a higher standard. There aren't any outfitters in the area we run, but there's always somebody that just refuses to follow the rules and it gives everyone a black eye. We run a tight ship and do everything we can to follow the rules and mitigate the bad publicity. It's sad when those that wont follow the rules muck it up for everyone else -especially with other hunters. The divide between our own will be our ultimate demise.
Yes, primarily public but scattered private that we are careful to respect. Knowing that about your area only embraces my comment about reporting those outfitters. Their intent sounds pretty blatant.I'm guessing the area you run has a lot of public land? This specific area does not. The closest reasonable tract of public land (more than 200 acres) to run the dogs is about 15 miles away.
The one guy literally told me "the only way to get the bears off all of your baits on private is to run our dogs through to chase them off. Call the Sheriff, I don't care, he won't do anything"Yes, primarily public but scattered private that we are careful to respect. Knowing that about your area only embraces my comment about reporting those outfitters. Their intent sounds pretty blatant.
The DNR will care.The one guy literally told me "the only way to get the bears off all of your baits on private is to run our dogs through to chase them off. Call the Sheriff, I don't care, he won't do anything"
Not true. This is an instance of trespassing - not hunting. The warden can't do anything other than what you can do - call the local sheriff since it is their office that deals with property trespassing.The DNR will care.
Well, I guess it depends on how mad you are and how far you want to push the issue at this point. It sucks that another hunter negatively affected your hunt.Not true. This is an instance of trespassing - not hunting. The warden can't do anything other than what you can do - call the local sheriff since it is their office that deals with property trespassing.
I don't think you fully understand the situation and numbers. This wasn't a hunter. It was numerous people running dogs (not even with hunters) with zero care or regard for the fact that the entire area was 100% private. If it was a single person, that is one thing. It was an entire culture of dozens of trucks running dogs with zero regard for the land in which they were doing it on. They didn't even have a hunter with them because their whole purpose wasn't to tree a bear because they knew they couldn't hunt it there. It was entirely to chase bears around and get them moving north the 15 miles up to the huge swath of public land.Well, I guess it depends on how mad you are and how far you want to push the issue at this point. It sucks that another hunter negatively affected your hunt.
How would I fully understand the situation when you did not share those details??I don't think you fully understand the situation and numbers. This wasn't a hunter. It was numerous people running dogs (not even with hunters) with zero care or regard for the fact that the entire area was 100% private. If it was a single person, that is one thing. It was an entire culture of dozens of trucks running dogs with zero regard for the land in which they were doing it on. They didn't even have a hunter with them because their whole purpose wasn't to tree a bear because they knew they couldn't hunt it there. It was entirely to chase bears around and get them moving north the 15 miles up to the huge swath of public land.
no, you are absolutely correct. We got put in a tough situation with selecting what our hunt dates would be. Our logic was that since we were in a high private area, the impact of hound hunters would be nothing since they can't legally use them in that area unless they were willing to trespass. Our assumption was wrong and it is for that that frustrates me. I cannot really comment on the missed bear, my wife was the one that missed it and it was at the one bait that we did not have any run ins with hounds.Just to clarify… you CHOSE to skip a week when no dogs were in use and baits were hot …. and missed a bear when dogs were in use … but it’s the houndsmens fault for allegedly trying to push bears 15 miles north that you didn’t get one?