Mudranger1
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jun 30, 2010
- Messages
- 2,892
ME!!!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sure, everything sounds reasonable on the surface. No one ever said he is dumb. However, these are all so open ended there is no telling what is behind it. 3. "Improve incentives for states to share information with the background check system" could be read "blackmail states to divuldge all info on every gun owner to the federal government. 7. "Launch a national safe and responsible gun ownership campaign" could be any number of things, all so restrictive it will be impossible to own a gun. The list goes on and on.
George W. Bush, I gave specific examples in a different thread. guessing you're talking about the patriot act. raised hell about that back then, also. but, that was not done with an executive order, was it?.
Why is the 2nd amendment more important than the 4th? guess I missed where someone says it is?
Look, you guys are starting to sound like the wolf hippies. Last week, these 19 executive orders were going to include SS types grabbing guns. and you continue to sound like a liberal.
Now that they're in print, you're dreaming up other reasons to be scared. glad to know you have no problem with the clown bypassing congress. you know, those people you elected to do what you want them to do. I do have a problem with him going around congress.
If you feel Illinois gun laws are unconstitutional, challenge them. we did. and we won. state has 180 days to pass a CCW law. Or just sit around crying about them, or move to Alaska. I don't know what else to tell you.think that answers you.
guessing you're talking about the patriot act. raised hell about that back then, also. but, that was not done with an executive order, was it?.
and you continue to sound like a liberal.
glad to know you have no problem with the clown bypassing congress. you know, those people you elected to do what you want them to do. I do have a problem with him going around congress.
we did. and we won. state has 180 days to pass a CCW law.
think that answers you.
Well, he was elected President and he as the authority to issue Executive orders.
We can't pick and choose how we are governed. By living here in the grand old US of A we agree to live with Democracy. Obama was elected President, which gives him the right to draft executive orders. The orders can be, and are, challenged in court. The court system decides if the order is Constitutional or not.
In 4 years, the people will elect another President, and we'll have to live with his/her decisions.
I truly hope Obama will do whatever it takes to rescue the Americans in Algeria.
Just wondering...if someone went through a bout of depression 3 years ago, (say a mother with the baby blues, who mentions it to her OBGYN) would she be denied the right to a firearm today even though her mental health condition is fine and has been fine for 3 years? or Is a veteran mentally unacceptable to have a fire arm because he/she has been to war and killed or saw another human die? If it takes a vet a few weeks to "assimilate" back into normal peaceful live in the good old USA will the vet be denied ever owning a fire arm?
Where do you draw the line?
There are too many holes in Obama's executive orders.
Thank you for the clarrification. It's a pet peeve of mine that too many folks consider what we have in the US a democracy.Very close.... just to clarify, We may live WITH democracy, however, that is NOT how we are governed and there is a difference. We live in a "representive republic" NOT a democracy. We elect a president NOT by the number of votes (democracy) but by the electoral college. Presidents have been elected with a lesser popular vote in the past. Once elected the congress passes the laws ond the president has the power to sign or NOT sign the bills into law. The president does NOT have supreme power given to him by the popular vote (a democracy).
good luck to all
the dog
Just wondering...if someone went through a bout of depression 3 years ago, (say a mother with the baby blues, who mentions it to her OBGYN) would she be denied the right to a firearm today even though her mental health condition is fine and has been fine for 3 years? or Is a veteran mentally unacceptable to have a fire arm because he/she has been to war and killed or saw another human die? If it takes a vet a few weeks to "assimilate" back into normal peaceful live in the good old USA will the vet be denied ever owning a fire arm?
Where do you draw the line?
There are too many holes in Obama's executive orders.
Very close.... just to clarify, We may live WITH democracy, however, that is NOT how we are governed and there is a difference. We live in a "representive republic" NOT a democracy. We elect a president NOT by the number of votes (democracy) but by the electoral college. Presidents have been elected with a lesser popular vote in the past. Once elected the congress passes the laws ond the president has the power to sign or NOT sign the bills into law. The president does NOT have supreme power given to him by the popular vote (a democracy).
good luck to all
the dog
Oh my word! What are we going to do with all these things! Curse you Obama! All seem reseaonable to me.
Any fees we pay for more inspections will be used to buy them more votes..
How can mental health patients be screened if doctors aren't involved?
How is someone deemed to be crazy, before they go on a shooting spree?
Does anyone have a solution to prevent mass shootings, that doesn't require more legislation?