sacountry
Well-known member
The extra tags do seem to fly in the face of one of Eric's beefs about the east side slaughtering of mule deer.I can't get over the fact that MOGA had all the sway with the Legislature, the Governor's office, and the Commission and we have Albus and Paschke who sit on the board of directors and have spent years talking about revamping the management structure- Instead of meaningful and long lasting improvements we just end up with an extra 3000+ combo tags and additional preference points for nonresidents for outfitters that apparently can't figure out how the hell a preference point system works.
It would be absolutely hilarious if it wasn't so goddamn sad and embarrassing. It's like someone cracking the first Yo Mama joke while the Titanic band plays on in the background.
In a diverse group of Sportsmen, I honestly question why the concept of fair chase doesn't transcend from the field to Helena as a common denominator in us all, but then again it's greed that gets in the way of fair chase in the field so too it gets in the way in Helena. I guess I just answered my own question.
I do also struggle with the concept that outfitters boost local economies to the point that we need to protect them with a handout. Resident hunters from big towns like Missoula, Billings, Great Falls bring way more money into Lima, Winnet, Broadus, or any town along the highline. We need to be giving those hunters some incentive to spread the wealth. Maybe resident DIY hunters should get 3 preference points for hunting 100 miles from their home? Or maybe NR outfitted hunters should have to pay for our resident hunting licenses through $5000 guaranteed combo tags revenue. Yeah, yeah, that's the ticket! Being ridiculous to show just how ridiculous HB637 is.
Last edited: