FairWeather
Well-known member
I have no idea what his real name is. This is the guy’s channel: https://youtube.com/@apex-livingwithpredators8379?si=5m4jpFz1PnuaeFYmBart George?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I have no idea what his real name is. This is the guy’s channel: https://youtube.com/@apex-livingwithpredators8379?si=5m4jpFz1PnuaeFYmBart George?
I think they do the same in WA. harassing cats into staying away from livestock. I think they use paintball guns and the like.
I have seen a griz lift his head at a distant gunshot at look towards it, as the second shot went off bear took off running directly towards where it came from. Never seen a bear run towards thunder(atleast not yet), i understand your point but disagree only cause i have seen it.Animals don't know the difference between a gun shot and thunder, they dont even know what death is. I was always under the assumption that either the sound of an animal getting hit, or animals reacting to an animal that has been hit and is flailing, or running off causes other animals to run. Just a theory
So we need 19 million Californians to move to Montana to even things out is what you're saying?Montana
147,070 sq miles
450,000 deer
140,000 elk
5300 cats
Just over a million people
California
155,812 sq miles
450,000 deer
4-6000 cats
38 million people
How could they not get accustomed to people?
California is working on that.So we need 19 million Californians to move to Montana to even things out is what you're saying?
So we need 19 million Californians to move to Montana to even things out is what you're saying?
The county isn't likely to go broke anytime soon, not as long as they keep hammering us for land taxes.Make California Great Again.....just need to make sure we keep Santa Clara county's economy in tact LOL
I'm the uncle of Taylen and Wyatt Brooks. The rate of attacks on humans in California has in fact snowballed since 117 declared the mountain lion a "specially protected species," and stripped what was then the Department of Fish and Game of any meaningful management authority. There were only two attacks from 1909 to 1990, both in the same park in So Cal in 1986, and both on young kids. In the aftermath of 117, there have been 25 attacks statewide, including four fatalities. It's important to note that "hunting" in the generic sense (i.e., a lethally taken lion) is NOT the critical dimension governing lion evasiveness toward the human population--even during the kill moratorium ushered in by Reagan, hound hunters were still entirely permitted to pursue lions with dogs on a catch-and-release basis, or what's known in that community as "tree-and-free." I knew a number of people who practiced this right up until 1990, when 117 forbid even that as part and parcel of the total hunting ban. The results are now obvious, with dangerously habituated lions sighted constantly in places and at times of day that nobody could have imagined in the pre-ban era. It's not the lethal take of lions on a sport basis that reinforces their normal tendency to avoid human interaction and habitation zones; it's the exercise of being pressured and treed by hound dogs in the service of human handlers, on a regular and consistent basis. For a compelling breakdown of this, please check out this video presentation from the MeatEater franchise:With the recent fatal mountain lion attack here in CA has many of the California hunting pages on FB filled with comments regarding them “losing their fear of man” because there is no hunting of them.
When I think about this statistically, it doesn’t make sense, and to me it’s just our anthropocentric interpretation of wildlife behavior.
In California Governor Reagan signed a mountain lion hunting moratorium in 1971, which was extended until 1991 when prop 117 was passed. So we have 53 years of no hunting, a population increase of 19 million people (20.3m -> 39.8M), continued loss of habitat yet no marked increase in attacks. Further, at first glance, states with regulated hunting have in general the same number of attacks that we have over the past 3 decades. Surely, if I dug into those numbers they’d be at a much higher rate per capita compared to California.
Certainly all animals have a natural fear of threats, elk and deer adapt to pressure which at its core is just an increase in human activity in their habitat. Conversely, they’ll also adapt and live closer to humans on the WUI type edges. I can understand animals adapting, but if mountain lions have “lost their fear of man” due to no hunting, shouldn’t there be an increase in attacks?