PrairieHunter
Well-known member
Its' almost funny to think that someone's 4th choice on an adjacent unit has preference on a persons first choice in that unit.They should eliminate the "adjacent unit" altogether. That's a really dumb system.
I've thought about this quite a bit. What factors could have caused Kansas to do this?
The only thing I could come up with is landowners who have property to 2 units pushed for this so they, their family/friends, or their guided hunters could hunt both units.
I don't believe NR hunters would have enough pull in the state to make such a rule as believe it or not it was only 1994 when they allowed non residents to even hunt deer in the state. Almost had to be farmer/outfitter driven rule to allow them more flexibility.
You are correct that this should be eliminated. That and go by first choice for everyone in the 0 preference point pool. Then move to second/third choices, and so on like other Western states do.
But at least we now know how the draw is done, but still really have no idea of the odds of drawing any particular unit.