Ithaca 37
New member
In the "Ithaca proposes extending" topic I was very unfairly attacked by Mule and MD4M. They had no idea what they were talking about when they criticized me for speaking at a recent F&G Commission meeting.
Here's my answer to them:
Here's Mules question. "Have quail populations in Idaho been on the decline in recent years due to ATV's,ranching or the timber industry?"
Here's my answer, "Hell yes! Riparian zones have been ruined by cattle (90% of all BLM riparian zones are in poor condition). That's where the quail live. If we had good riparian zones we'd have fantastic quail hunting on BLM---ten times better than now, at least. Probably fifty times better.
Grazing has also destroyed the migration corridors for Mountain Quail. That's why we don't have enough to hunt anymore. They're a candidate for the ESA."
********************************************
Notice I made it clear I was talking about BLM. Mule criticized me for proposing a two week extension of the quail season. Here's my answer:
********************************************
We haven't had season on Mountain Quail in about 25 years. We do have a season on California Quail. Where they have good habitat they're thriving.
Here's a table showing the quail harvest in Idaho:
http://www2.state.id.us/fishgame/hunt/programsinfo/genharv/ugharv.htm
Notice the wide yearly fluctuations? WEATHER! Notice the trend since '91?
Now, here's what's going on: Less quail on overgrazed BLM. Especially where the riparian zones have been destroyed. I would have a very hard time finding quail on BLM if I went looking for them. When I find them on BLM it's a pleasant surprise. They just don't like to live where the riparian zones have been trashed by cattle---which the BLM says is 90% of them.
Private land, which is usually not grazed as hard or as destructively---The quail are thriving. If BLM was in good shape we'd be getting over a million quail a year. Easy! We'd have hunters coming from all over the country!
So---Where the ATVs and welfare ranching are destroying habitat and disturbing quail it's been a disaster for quail populations. Comprehend?
Now, look at the harvest. Understand why I'd be recommending extending the season by two weeks!
Average life of a quail is 14 months. Most of them die of natural causes.
Of course I could sit on my ass and do nothing, like so many others here. But I saw an opportunity to try to increase total hunter days afield.
How's that for an agenda ( for all of you that are always telling us what my agenda is)? Why didn't anyone else notice what I did and start lobbying for more hunter days?
Thanks in advance for your appreciation! Frankly, sometimes I wonder why I bother. So many hunters are just like some of the do nothings on this board. It's not like I need more days to hunt. If the F&G doesn't lengthen the season I'll just keep on hunting for quail in Oregon after the Idaho season closes. As I do now.
But is it better for hunting, in general, if we have more hunting opportunities?
Why don't a few of you tell me about my agenda again?
--------------------
"Any hunter or angler who is not an environmentalist...is a damned fool." Conservation writer Ted Williams
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Here's another part of my answer when I was criticized by MD4M for other comments I made to the F&G Commission proposing eliminating the Clearwater Deer permit:
Please remember that I didn't start this topic. It was started in an effort to criticize me. Since I explained the quail situation I'll also explain why I proposed eliminating the Clearwater Permit. It restricts hunter days ("hunter days" is a term used by F&G to measure hunter opportunity) by requiring people who want to hunt deer in the Clearwater units to hunt only there---nowhere else. We used to be able to hunt deer anywhere in Idaho and could freely move from any unit to any other. Locals in the Clearwater Region didn't like the idea of hunters from other parts of the state participating in the late whitetail hunts there, so they pressured their F&G Commissioner to place restrictions on who could hunt there. He got enough Commissioners to vote for the idea and it was instituted. I fought against it and organized others to. So did a few other guys---mostly in the Deer Hunters of Idaho organization.
I always hunt in the Clearwater Region. Eliminating the permit there will only increase the hunters and might possibly affect my hunting. But it's the RIGHT thing to do and can only help create more hunting opportunities for other hunters.
That's why I spoke in favor of eliminating the Clearwater permit.
Now, what's to criticize about that? I suppose MD4M and a few others will try to say it's part of some secret agenda of mine for something!! A "Secret Agenda" to increase hunting opportunities for other hunters when there's really nothing in it for me?!!!
That's the kind of crap Mule and MD4M are trying to feed all of you!!!
Mule and MD4M, Thanks in advance for your apologies!
--------------------
This was all copied from the "Ithaca Proposes..." topic.
Here's what the F&G Secretary had put in the public meeting notes about my comments (which is what Mule & MD4M were criticizing):
(Ithaca 37)...extension of quail season supported. Turkey regulations for Fall hunts and tag prices. Supports lower fees that are proposed. Clearwater deer tag is a social device that should be eliminated because we have too many whitetails in the region. ATV abuse is getting worse and their use by hunters should be restricted."
Extend quail season, lower tag prices, eliminate restriction on where hunters can go to hunt, protect us from ATV abuse!!!
Does that sound like an anti hunting agenda that MD4M, Paul and a few others are always accusing me of!!! Remember, these were comments at a public meeting with Idaho F&G commissioners soliciting opinions on policy!!!
I'd say MD4M, Mule, Paul, Lost, Ten, and mike don't know what they're talking about!!!!
Did any of them ever speak to a F&G Commission in favor of increasing hunter opportunities? Or even anything at all!!!
<FONT COLOR="#800080" SIZE="1">[ 02-14-2003 23:25: Message edited by: Ithaca 37 ]</font>
Here's my answer to them:
Here's Mules question. "Have quail populations in Idaho been on the decline in recent years due to ATV's,ranching or the timber industry?"
Here's my answer, "Hell yes! Riparian zones have been ruined by cattle (90% of all BLM riparian zones are in poor condition). That's where the quail live. If we had good riparian zones we'd have fantastic quail hunting on BLM---ten times better than now, at least. Probably fifty times better.
Grazing has also destroyed the migration corridors for Mountain Quail. That's why we don't have enough to hunt anymore. They're a candidate for the ESA."
********************************************
Notice I made it clear I was talking about BLM. Mule criticized me for proposing a two week extension of the quail season. Here's my answer:
********************************************
We haven't had season on Mountain Quail in about 25 years. We do have a season on California Quail. Where they have good habitat they're thriving.
Here's a table showing the quail harvest in Idaho:
http://www2.state.id.us/fishgame/hunt/programsinfo/genharv/ugharv.htm
Notice the wide yearly fluctuations? WEATHER! Notice the trend since '91?
Now, here's what's going on: Less quail on overgrazed BLM. Especially where the riparian zones have been destroyed. I would have a very hard time finding quail on BLM if I went looking for them. When I find them on BLM it's a pleasant surprise. They just don't like to live where the riparian zones have been trashed by cattle---which the BLM says is 90% of them.
Private land, which is usually not grazed as hard or as destructively---The quail are thriving. If BLM was in good shape we'd be getting over a million quail a year. Easy! We'd have hunters coming from all over the country!
So---Where the ATVs and welfare ranching are destroying habitat and disturbing quail it's been a disaster for quail populations. Comprehend?
Now, look at the harvest. Understand why I'd be recommending extending the season by two weeks!
Average life of a quail is 14 months. Most of them die of natural causes.
Of course I could sit on my ass and do nothing, like so many others here. But I saw an opportunity to try to increase total hunter days afield.
How's that for an agenda ( for all of you that are always telling us what my agenda is)? Why didn't anyone else notice what I did and start lobbying for more hunter days?
Thanks in advance for your appreciation! Frankly, sometimes I wonder why I bother. So many hunters are just like some of the do nothings on this board. It's not like I need more days to hunt. If the F&G doesn't lengthen the season I'll just keep on hunting for quail in Oregon after the Idaho season closes. As I do now.
But is it better for hunting, in general, if we have more hunting opportunities?
Why don't a few of you tell me about my agenda again?
--------------------
"Any hunter or angler who is not an environmentalist...is a damned fool." Conservation writer Ted Williams
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Here's another part of my answer when I was criticized by MD4M for other comments I made to the F&G Commission proposing eliminating the Clearwater Deer permit:
Please remember that I didn't start this topic. It was started in an effort to criticize me. Since I explained the quail situation I'll also explain why I proposed eliminating the Clearwater Permit. It restricts hunter days ("hunter days" is a term used by F&G to measure hunter opportunity) by requiring people who want to hunt deer in the Clearwater units to hunt only there---nowhere else. We used to be able to hunt deer anywhere in Idaho and could freely move from any unit to any other. Locals in the Clearwater Region didn't like the idea of hunters from other parts of the state participating in the late whitetail hunts there, so they pressured their F&G Commissioner to place restrictions on who could hunt there. He got enough Commissioners to vote for the idea and it was instituted. I fought against it and organized others to. So did a few other guys---mostly in the Deer Hunters of Idaho organization.
I always hunt in the Clearwater Region. Eliminating the permit there will only increase the hunters and might possibly affect my hunting. But it's the RIGHT thing to do and can only help create more hunting opportunities for other hunters.
That's why I spoke in favor of eliminating the Clearwater permit.
Now, what's to criticize about that? I suppose MD4M and a few others will try to say it's part of some secret agenda of mine for something!! A "Secret Agenda" to increase hunting opportunities for other hunters when there's really nothing in it for me?!!!
That's the kind of crap Mule and MD4M are trying to feed all of you!!!
Mule and MD4M, Thanks in advance for your apologies!
--------------------
This was all copied from the "Ithaca Proposes..." topic.
Here's what the F&G Secretary had put in the public meeting notes about my comments (which is what Mule & MD4M were criticizing):
(Ithaca 37)...extension of quail season supported. Turkey regulations for Fall hunts and tag prices. Supports lower fees that are proposed. Clearwater deer tag is a social device that should be eliminated because we have too many whitetails in the region. ATV abuse is getting worse and their use by hunters should be restricted."
Extend quail season, lower tag prices, eliminate restriction on where hunters can go to hunt, protect us from ATV abuse!!!
Does that sound like an anti hunting agenda that MD4M, Paul and a few others are always accusing me of!!! Remember, these were comments at a public meeting with Idaho F&G commissioners soliciting opinions on policy!!!
I'd say MD4M, Mule, Paul, Lost, Ten, and mike don't know what they're talking about!!!!
Did any of them ever speak to a F&G Commission in favor of increasing hunter opportunities? Or even anything at all!!!
<FONT COLOR="#800080" SIZE="1">[ 02-14-2003 23:25: Message edited by: Ithaca 37 ]</font>