cjcj
New member
Buzz you even know the call letters...must mean you listen to it... really i don`t ....i am more for local am... and Savage if he`s on about immigration.
I have no words for this one,
- Thread starter feclnogn
- Start date
Ten Bears
New member
I bet MATT would be screaming like a little pig if some anti-bush/war information table had all their propaganda torn up by some military guys. 
You still need to show where their "rights" came from that allowed them to destroy "public" property. Freedom of speech ends when you lay hands on a person or property that you oppose. Are you saying that these students were demonstrating in a peaceful manner? Please..., you & EG really can't be that dense.
You still need to show where their "rights" came from that allowed them to destroy "public" property. Freedom of speech ends when you lay hands on a person or property that you oppose. Are you saying that these students were demonstrating in a peaceful manner? Please..., you & EG really can't be that dense.
TB- You are a joke. Prove the demonstration was illegal. Call the local sheriff or police officer, show them the picture, give them the details. See how many officers will "go after" the dastardly insurgents of public peace. I'll give you a hint.... NONE!!! If the military were to do the same thing I would be pissed!!! If another group of demonstrators did the same thing, I wouldn't complain at all (Even if I was at the table.) The military is supposed to be non-partisan, non-political.
Ten Bears
New member
MATT, please grow up a bit. I didn't call for anyone to be arrested. I would support those student destructively demonstrating to be expelled for the semester. You have failed in every attempt to prove a point you can't even find support for, too bad matty.
I wonder what the student guidelines say at that school about public disruptions?????? Being a liberal school, probably nothing.
EDITTED PORTION
I see the students didn't even come close to the Code of Conduct for their institution:
I wonder what the student guidelines say at that school about public disruptions?????? Being a liberal school, probably nothing.
EDITTED PORTION
I see the students didn't even come close to the Code of Conduct for their institution:
http://seattlecentral.edu/sac/facilities/code.html
cjcj
New member
Good post Ten Bears [code of conduct] clearly shown.
TB/CJCJ- Great post! Those horrible code of conduct breakers! Expel them! Now I completely agree with you, they should be hung from the rafters and sticks inserted under their toe nails.
Now show me the part where it says no demonstrations... Prove to me they were illegal. Show the penalty for code of conduct breaching would be expelling the student. Prove they were all students. Good luck and again nice try.
I have shown the legality of demonstration is a constitutional issue. Look at my links and they show the supreme court cases, it's as easy as that.
Now show me the part where it says no demonstrations... Prove to me they were illegal. Show the penalty for code of conduct breaching would be expelling the student. Prove they were all students. Good luck and again nice try.
I have shown the legality of demonstration is a constitutional issue. Look at my links and they show the supreme court cases, it's as easy as that.
Ten Bears
New member
MATT, you may have proven to yourself, but you failed to show anybody else here that any demonstration other then peaceful and orderly is anything but illegal.
BTW how often have you seen anybody "hung from the rafters and sticks inserted under their toe nails" other then in movies. Come back to reality boy, we're over here.
BTW how often have you seen anybody "hung from the rafters and sticks inserted under their toe nails" other then in movies. Come back to reality boy, we're over here.
BigHornRam
Well-known member
Matt,
Your right about one thing on this thread. I bet most of the freaks in the photo were not students. Most were probably faculty. Keep taking rope. You should just about have enough by now to do it up right!
Your right about one thing on this thread. I bet most of the freaks in the photo were not students. Most were probably faculty. Keep taking rope. You should just about have enough by now to do it up right!
Ten Bears
New member
MATT, please feel free to direct our attention to one link the constitutionally guarantees a "right to demonstrate/protest" in a manner other then peaceful and/or orderly.
Ten Bears
New member
None of those imply a "peaceful" demonstration.
BTW, who are you to say the military should be non-partisan and non-political. Do you then support removing the right to vote from members of the military (that'll go far). Let me say that while the military follows no one politacl party, the right to vote is deeply guarded there. Why would you "sqeal like a little pig" if there were members of the military tearing up anti-war propaganda?
JoseCuervo
New member
Ten Beers,
If you would learn to read (I think it will happen next year when you are in the 4th grade), you will see that the literature torn up was "U.S Army literature". In this case, U.S Army is an adjective, modifying the noun "literature" describing the content of the literature, but not the ownership of the literature.
If the US Army owned the literature, it would state they tore up the "U.S Army's literarture." To show possession, you would need the Army to have the apostrophe "s".
If you would learn to read (I think it will happen next year when you are in the 4th grade), you will see that the literature torn up was "U.S Army literature". In this case, U.S Army is an adjective, modifying the noun "literature" describing the content of the literature, but not the ownership of the literature.
If the US Army owned the literature, it would state they tore up the "U.S Army's literarture." To show possession, you would need the Army to have the apostrophe "s".
Ten Bears
New member
EG, the point you seem to miss (selective comprehension, not service) is the statement involving the destruction of public or private property. I would be glad to hear your explanation that Army Literature is neither, so please, go ahead......
Army Literature is not necessarily, but can be, private property. If a person in the military tears up a peace of anti-war propaganda, I would have no problem with that. Go for it! The military should not do this. Just a matter of record, acting as a government entity, they can not. Please read further in my links... The US Marines should not be and are not a political entity. The members (as citizens of the United States) have a right to protest as much as they wish as well as have the right to vote.
Have you ever heard any superior officer tell any other military personel to vote a certain way? If so, please turn the person in that did so. Again, the military is non-partisan, non-political...
Have you ever heard any superior officer tell any other military personel to vote a certain way? If so, please turn the person in that did so. Again, the military is non-partisan, non-political...
Ten Bears
New member
From my original statement "I bet MATT would be screaming like a little pig if some anti-bush/war information table had all their propaganda torn up by some military guys."
FLIP FLOP FLIP FLOP.......
JoseCuervo
New member
Ten Beers,
As we know it was not the Army's property (remember, no possesive statement), it can not be Public property (assuming US Army property is considered "Public").
Private property can be destroyed by the owners. That hardly makes a "riot". I throw trash away all the time, hardly a riot.
But I will play your stupid game. If destroying Public Property is a "riot", Then I think you just further aided in the efforts of banning Fat-Assed ATV riders. As if 3 of them are riding on Public Lands, we can now call it a riot, and they must be dealt with severely.
As we know it was not the Army's property (remember, no possesive statement), it can not be Public property (assuming US Army property is considered "Public").
Private property can be destroyed by the owners. That hardly makes a "riot". I throw trash away all the time, hardly a riot.
But I will play your stupid game. If destroying Public Property is a "riot", Then I think you just further aided in the efforts of banning Fat-Assed ATV riders. As if 3 of them are riding on Public Lands, we can now call it a riot, and they must be dealt with severely.
SageGhost
New member
call me old fashioned but i think he is smiling because he knew 8 million Iraqis were going to vote!
