feclnogn
New member
Seattle 2005
Fallujah 2004
Fallujah 2004
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If you want to call the Einsteins, George Washingtons, Thomas Jeffersons, Ben Franklins, Abe Lincolns
You may wish to speak to congress, senate and president when you talk about whiny kids that should be sent to Iraq. It sure is easy to send someone to a desert to be killed, if you have nothing but words at stake. Would you send your relatives in support of this war?
Nemont said:Quote:
If you want to call the Einsteins, George Washingtons, Thomas Jeffersons, Ben Franklins, Abe Lincolns
Tell me where I said this any of these guys were whiny liberals :
Everyone of those guys made a sacrifice for this country. I don't think one of them every hounded a military man until he had to be moved from a job he had been giving.
Nemont
No, they look at protesters as being snot-nosed little pricks because they are rude, foul-mouthed, spit-in-your-face jobless ass hats. Peaceful protest? Get your message out without being offensive? I'm all for a peaceful debate. And no Matt, I don't mean offensive because of disagreement. I mean offensive because of their tone and vile crap that is spit all over passers-by.People look at protesters as being snot nosed kids because they disagree with what they are saying.
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real"
"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton.
"I think that we were right to go. I think we were right to go to the United Nations. I think we couldn’t let those who could veto in the Security Council hold us hostage.
And I think Saddam Hussein, being gone is good. Good for the American people, good for the security of that region of the world, and good for the Iraqi people."
http://www3.state.id.us/cgi-bin/newidst?sctid=180640001.KTITLE 18
CRIMES AND PUNISHMENTS
CHAPTER 64
RIOT, ROUT, UNLAWFUL ASSEMBLY,
PRIZE FIGHTING, DISTURBING PEACE
18-6401. RIOT DEFINED. Any action, use of force or violence, or threat
thereof, disturbing the public peace, or any threat to use such force or
violence, if accompanied by immediate power of execution, by two (2) or more
persons acting together, and without authority of law, which results in:
(a) physical injury to any person; or
(b) damage or destruction to public or private property; or
(c) a disturbance of the public peace;
is a riot.
Moosie it would appear to be "harrassment"... the recruiter was "forced" to leave at the overwhelming "disturbance" by the protestersMoosie said:Fine line between Protesting which I'm for.... and Harassing which I'm not for.
Someone clarrify what happened in the Picture...........
http://www.answers.com/main/ntquery?method=4&dsid=2049&dekey=firstamendme&gwp=8&curtab=2049_1First Amendment
An amendment to the United States Constitution guaranteeing the rights of free expression and action that are fundamental to democratic government. These rights include freedom of assembly, freedom of the press, freedom of religion, and freedom of speech. The government is empowered, however, to restrict these freedoms if expression threatens to be destructive. Argument over the extent of First Amendment freedoms has often reached the Supreme Court. (See clear and present danger, libel, and obscenity.)
http://www.answers.com/main/ntquery?method=4&dsid=2051&dekey=freedomofass&gwp=8&curtab=2051_1freedom of assembly
The right to hold public meetings and form associations without interference by the government. Freedom of peaceful assembly is guaranteed by the First Amendment to the Constitution.
BigHornRam said:Nemont, Ten , Cali, and all the rest of you who have served our country, THANK YOU!