Dougfirtree
Well-known member
The Rinella DDD thread got me wondering, but I don't want to hijack that discussion. Matt Rinella states that hunter numbers are actually up since the 60's in most of the U.S. and continue to rise in the west and southeast.
Does anyone have access to good data about hunting numbers around the country and how they've changed over time? Does his statement strike you as true? Seems to me like there's two issues; overall hunter numbers and the % of the population hunting. I'm guessing that percentage has been plummeting like a shotgun slug at a long range shooting competition.
How does it appear where you live? More crowded than ever? Quiet? Is this a good thing? Bad thing? I'd be interested in hearing everyone's thoughts/observations on the issue of hunter numbers.
Here in northern NY, It appears to me that hunter numbers are down and falling. My sense is that it has alot to do with the excitement factor. There are still plenty of hunters out at pheasant releasing time and a decent number of duck hunters on Lake Champlain. Most good private property has a hunter or two with permission to hunt there, finding private access is not easy. But deer camps are fading, the number of hunters in the Adirondack woods chasing whitetails seems to be dropping and small game hunting seems almost non-existent. Just a handful of weirdos (like myself) still hunting squirrels, rabbits and grouse. Basically, if the type of hunting has a reasonable high chance of action AND a charasmatic game species, it's doing ok, but the rest is slowly fading.
As for the question of how important hunter numbers are, I'm definitely not at either end of the spectrum, but I tend to err on the side of public perception being more politically important than having tons of voting hunters out there. I don't have a ton of hunting friends, but I also don't know many people who are really opposed to hunting. That seems like a livable situation.
Does anyone have access to good data about hunting numbers around the country and how they've changed over time? Does his statement strike you as true? Seems to me like there's two issues; overall hunter numbers and the % of the population hunting. I'm guessing that percentage has been plummeting like a shotgun slug at a long range shooting competition.
How does it appear where you live? More crowded than ever? Quiet? Is this a good thing? Bad thing? I'd be interested in hearing everyone's thoughts/observations on the issue of hunter numbers.
Here in northern NY, It appears to me that hunter numbers are down and falling. My sense is that it has alot to do with the excitement factor. There are still plenty of hunters out at pheasant releasing time and a decent number of duck hunters on Lake Champlain. Most good private property has a hunter or two with permission to hunt there, finding private access is not easy. But deer camps are fading, the number of hunters in the Adirondack woods chasing whitetails seems to be dropping and small game hunting seems almost non-existent. Just a handful of weirdos (like myself) still hunting squirrels, rabbits and grouse. Basically, if the type of hunting has a reasonable high chance of action AND a charasmatic game species, it's doing ok, but the rest is slowly fading.
As for the question of how important hunter numbers are, I'm definitely not at either end of the spectrum, but I tend to err on the side of public perception being more politically important than having tons of voting hunters out there. I don't have a ton of hunting friends, but I also don't know many people who are really opposed to hunting. That seems like a livable situation.