noharleyyet
Well-known member
I've always relied on the closest rifle dates to the rut.....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I appreciate the response and don’t ask this question as a challenge in any way.It's unit specific but take it with a grain of salt. Colorado sends random surveys out to hunters and compiles information based on the handful of responses they get back. It's an educated guess, at best. In addition to that, I know of many hunters that aren't truthful in their responses to the surveys, i.e. they might not report of being successful to avoid others targeting the area because of high success rates. Again, I wouldn't base anything solely on those success rates.
That's a great point, and yes, you are probably correct that it has higher success rates to some degree. To what degree is the difficult question. It's probably worth doing some digging to see if you can find out why the success rates might go down that much as well. A phone call to the local wildlife agent in the area could be worth it. Maybe the success looks like that because elk move onto private land after the shooting starts, in which case it might be more beneficial for you? I'm not saying that's the case, but I've seen that in certain units.I appreciate the response and don’t ask this question as a challenge in any way.
However, if the survey process is consistent, which I believe it is regardless of season, then if all things are equal and one season has a much higher success rate than the others, how can one not believe that the success rate is actually higher?
In short, regardless of the season and going back 5 years, first rifle is always showing twice the success rate (approximately) as second rifle. So unless the survey process is different for first rifle than second, first rifle success rate has to be higher to at least some degree. Right?
If you wanna start a real chitstorm, ask about moon phase . . .I appreciate the response and don’t ask this question as a challenge in any way.
However, if the survey process is consistent, which I believe it is regardless of season, then if all things are equal and one season has a much higher success rate than the others, how can one not believe that the success rate is actually higher?
In short, regardless of the season and going back 5 years, first rifle is always showing twice the success rate (approximately) as second rifle. So unless the survey process is different for first rifle than second, first rifle success rate has to be higher to at least some degree. Right?
Thank you again!That's a great point, and yes, you are probably correct that it has higher success rates to some degree. To what degree is the difficult question. It's probably worth doing some digging to see if you can find out why the success rates might go down that much as well. A phone call to the local wildlife agent in the area could be worth it. Maybe the success looks like that because elk move onto private land after the shooting starts, in which case it might be more beneficial for you? I'm not saying that's the case, but I've seen that in certain units.
Not sure I follow. I was (am?) leaning #1. I am probably putting way too much stock in the success rates.Of course it is #2 and you asked us to justify the fact you were already decided on #2.