sacountry
Well-known member
Not yet at least. They'll still have to vote on it. Not sure why RunningWolf motioned to table it, then appeared to vote against Tabling it.Which means? If it’s tabled, it’s not going to floor correct?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not yet at least. They'll still have to vote on it. Not sure why RunningWolf motioned to table it, then appeared to vote against Tabling it.Which means? If it’s tabled, it’s not going to floor correct?
A minor W for us then? That confused me as well.Not yet at least. They'll still have to vote on it. Not sure why RunningWolf motioned to table it, then appeared to vote against Tabling it.
Not yet at least. They'll still have to vote on it. Not sure why RunningWolf motioned to table it, then appeared to vote against Tabling it.
The landowner could get their outfitter's license if they felt so inclined to pocket that money themselves. It's not exactly a PhD program.What a freaking gong show.....so the landowner can't make money on the hunting, but they sure can jack up the Outfitter lease fees. Freaking D.U.M.B
That was a yes vote to table and move onSo did it pass or fail, what was that last proxy vote???
9 to 9 ties it which kills it....and then it gets tabled ?!?!?!? How? Ben???
My link cut out right then and I was left wonderingThat was a yes vote to table and move on
Oh, it was on the motion to table! Whew.That was a yes vote to table and move on