Kenetrek Boots

Gotta Love Montana's Gun Loving Senators

BigHornRam

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 15, 2004
Messages
14,149
Location
"Land of Giant Rams"
They must not be fans of bear spray either. It will make it easier for me to cut through the Park on the way to find my Mountain Goat next year, too!

Baucus, Tester press for loosening gun laws in parks, refuges
By NOELLE STRAUB of the Missoulian D.C. Bureau



WASHINGTON - Montana Democratic Sens. Max Baucus and Jon Tester are pushing to allow gun owners to carry their firearms into all national parks and wildlife refuges.

The pair signed a letter to Interior Secretary Dirk Kempthorne on Friday asking him to lift restrictions that prevent citizens from carrying their readily accessible firearms onto lands managed by the National Park Service and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

Forty-seven senators signed the letter, including the Montana, Idaho and Wyoming delegations.


The letter noted that Park Service and Fish and Wildlife Service rules apply even to citizens with valid concealed weapons permits. “These regulations infringe on the rights of law-abiding gun owners who wish to transport and carry firearms on or across these lands,” the senators wrote.

Opponents of the change argue that it would lead to more poaching and accidental shootings in the parks.

The letter noted that the Bureau of Land Management and the U.S. Forest Service allow transporting and carrying of firearms on their lands in accordance with the laws of the host state. It added that a similar exception for parks and refuges “would respect the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding gun owners, while providing a consistent application of state weapon laws across all land ownership boundaries.”

“These inconsistencies in firearms regulations for public lands are confusing, burdensome, and unnecessary,” the letter said.

Baucus spokesman Barrett Kaiser said there's “no reason that law-abiding citizens shouldn't be allowed to carry a firearm on our public lands.”

“Max thinks it's a matter of Second Amendment rights, and it's also the right thing to do for people who simply want to cross through our parks to access prime hunting areas,” he said.

Tester spokesman Aaron Murphy said the effort is about public access as much as about gun rights.

“If you live in Cooke City and you go hunting near Bozeman, there's a pretty good chance you're going to transport a gun through a national park,” he said. “Jon believes law-abiding Montanans have a constitutional right to haul firearms through parks without having to break them down.”

Interior spokesman Chris Paolino said the letter had been received.

“We are reviewing it and we'll take the senators' views into consideration,” Paolino said.

Current regulations state that weapons must be rendered inaccessible, said Jerry Case, chief for regulations and special park uses for the National Park Service. That means they do not have to be disassembled, but instead simply must be put somewhere not readily accessible, such as in a car trunk.

“They don't have to be broken down,” he said. “Preferably they're in your trunk and unloaded. Our regulations do allow people to transport weapons through a park as long as it's not accessible.”

Case said the Interior Department regulations were first promulgated in the 1980s and were primarily meant to ensure public safety and to provide maximum protection for wildlife.

“One of our major concerns is that folks who have ready access to them infrequently - more than we like to see, though - use them on park wildlife,” he said.

He also noted that some parks have many people in campsites, and “if you have people start plinking around with weapons, then you have accidents,” he said.

National parks have the lowest crime rate when compared to similarly sized communities outside parks, he added.

Laura Loomis, senior director of government affairs for the National Parks Conservation Association, said that group supports the current regulations.

“There's no reason to need a gun in a national park and it would possibly lead to unfortunate accidents and other problems, so we'd rather not see them in the parks,” she said.
 
Is Laura Loomis stating that there have been no crimes against persons committed in national parks? Does she believe that someone who is going to poach an animal in a national park will be disuaded by a law against firearms? Somehow her argument doesn't hold water.

:cool:
 
inaccessible, said Jerry Case, chief for regulations and special park uses for the National Park Service. That means they do not have to be disassembled, but instead simply must be put somewhere not readily accessible, such as in a car trunk.

“They don't have to be broken down,” he said. “Preferably they're in your trunk and unloaded. Our regulations do allow people to transport weapons

That's interesting, because, up here, I travel through Denali N.P. all the time. They have a sign that says firearms only need to be UNLOADED, not inaccessible. I wonder if there are different rules for different parks? You would think that the NPS rules would be the same for all National Parks.
 
Some of the Rangers at Yellowstone can be real dinks. I understand hunters going into Slough Creek which is north of the Park (trailhead starts inside the Park) have to pack their guns in from the Cooke City/Daisy Pass area which is outside the Park. Adds considerable distance to access the area. Not sure if this is actual law or it's just not worth dealing with the pricks.

Anyway this new law would make packing a rifle through Jellystone clearly legal.
 
Seems like with all the failures of the current Congress and the Dubya Administration, they should be able to find more pressing issues to address.
 
Hey, Montana's Democratic Senators are reaching out to the other side to try and get something started. Start with easy issues Jose, and then move on to the tough ones. Patience.
 
Yeti GOBOX Collection

Forum statistics

Threads
113,580
Messages
2,025,814
Members
36,237
Latest member
SCOOTER848
Back
Top