Fish and Wildlife Commission sued over open-meeting law, black bear quotas

TheJason

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 21, 2024
Messages
18,728
Location
Somewhere under the rainbow
It watched that meeting and it was pretty alarming, to say the least.
I watched it as well and felt like there was something shady to it. Considering that amendment was proposed during the meeting, it was odd to me that there was a decent amount of public comment in support of it. It felt like they knew it was coming…
 
I watched it as well and felt like there was something shady to it. Considering that amendment was proposed during the meeting, it was odd to me that there was a decent amount of public comment in support of it. It felt like they knew it was coming…
Absolutely. There is so much inside nonsense that goes on with the various commissions and really the FWP, Governors office, etc. its sickening. It's no different in WY, CO, NM, OR, etc.

All of them drone on about transparency and then do everything they can not to be transparent. They also drone on about public involvement, we want to hear from our constituents...its all a lie. They don't like to hear from the public.

They would much rather just cater to the rich, developers, real estate agents, extractive industry, ranchers, outfitters and be done with it.

I hope they get their ass handed to them with the lawsuit.
 
Absolutely. There is so much inside nonsense that goes on with the various commissions and really the FWP, Governors office, etc. its sickening. It's no different in WY, CO, NM, OR, etc.

All of them drone on about transparency and then do everything they can not to be transparent. They also drone on about public involvement, we want to hear from our constituents...its all a lie. They don't like to hear from the public.

They would much rather just cater to the rich, developers, real estate agents, extractive industry, ranchers, outfitters and be done with it.

I hope they get their ass handed to them with the lawsuit.
Well f-ing said.
 
This isn’t a new strategy. They have done this before. And I’m sure Buzz is right in that it happens in a lot of states. I have seen instances of emails where MT has asked FWP legal council if they can get away with no public comment on stuff. The main problem is there is no group willing to sue them until the action taken in the meeting fits their narrative. I guess some groups thought this one did.

 
Absolutely. There is so much inside nonsense that goes on with the various commissions and really the FWP, Governors office, etc. its sickening. It's no different in WY, CO, NM, OR, etc.

All of them drone on about transparency and then do everything they can not to be transparent. They also drone on about public involvement, we want to hear from our constituents...its all a lie. They don't like to hear from the public.

They would much rather just cater to the rich, developers, real estate agents, extractive industry, ranchers, outfitters and be done with it.

I hope they get their ass handed to them with the lawsuit.
Dead on. Only slight difference in CO is they cater to Chairman Polis and the anti-hunting, animal rights, pro-wolf professional activists and advocates. Same issues with transparency, open meetings laws, and accountability. Wrong either way.
 
It's unfortunate, but the only way to address these issues is to sue the living crap out of the agencies and commission. Its why I'm uncomfortable with any talk of making it more difficult for lawsuits to be filed and any "reform" to the EAJA.

Some of the only teeth we have is to litigate this kind of crap, take that away, we're really McScrewed.
 
Use Promo Code Randy for 20% off OutdoorClass

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
114,370
Messages
2,054,495
Members
36,570
Latest member
ihgodfather
Back
Top