Yeti GOBOX Collection

Fish and Wildlife Commission sued over open-meeting law, black bear quotas

TheJason

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 21, 2024
Messages
18,728
Location
Somewhere under the rainbow
It watched that meeting and it was pretty alarming, to say the least.
I watched it as well and felt like there was something shady to it. Considering that amendment was proposed during the meeting, it was odd to me that there was a decent amount of public comment in support of it. It felt like they knew it was coming…
 
I watched it as well and felt like there was something shady to it. Considering that amendment was proposed during the meeting, it was odd to me that there was a decent amount of public comment in support of it. It felt like they knew it was coming…
Absolutely. There is so much inside nonsense that goes on with the various commissions and really the FWP, Governors office, etc. its sickening. It's no different in WY, CO, NM, OR, etc.

All of them drone on about transparency and then do everything they can not to be transparent. They also drone on about public involvement, we want to hear from our constituents...its all a lie. They don't like to hear from the public.

They would much rather just cater to the rich, developers, real estate agents, extractive industry, ranchers, outfitters and be done with it.

I hope they get their ass handed to them with the lawsuit.
 
Absolutely. There is so much inside nonsense that goes on with the various commissions and really the FWP, Governors office, etc. its sickening. It's no different in WY, CO, NM, OR, etc.

All of them drone on about transparency and then do everything they can not to be transparent. They also drone on about public involvement, we want to hear from our constituents...its all a lie. They don't like to hear from the public.

They would much rather just cater to the rich, developers, real estate agents, extractive industry, ranchers, outfitters and be done with it.

I hope they get their ass handed to them with the lawsuit.
Well f-ing said.
 
This isn’t a new strategy. They have done this before. And I’m sure Buzz is right in that it happens in a lot of states. I have seen instances of emails where MT has asked FWP legal council if they can get away with no public comment on stuff. The main problem is there is no group willing to sue them until the action taken in the meeting fits their narrative. I guess some groups thought this one did.

 
Absolutely. There is so much inside nonsense that goes on with the various commissions and really the FWP, Governors office, etc. its sickening. It's no different in WY, CO, NM, OR, etc.

All of them drone on about transparency and then do everything they can not to be transparent. They also drone on about public involvement, we want to hear from our constituents...its all a lie. They don't like to hear from the public.

They would much rather just cater to the rich, developers, real estate agents, extractive industry, ranchers, outfitters and be done with it.

I hope they get their ass handed to them with the lawsuit.
Dead on. Only slight difference in CO is they cater to Chairman Polis and the anti-hunting, animal rights, pro-wolf professional activists and advocates. Same issues with transparency, open meetings laws, and accountability. Wrong either way.
 
It's unfortunate, but the only way to address these issues is to sue the living crap out of the agencies and commission. Its why I'm uncomfortable with any talk of making it more difficult for lawsuits to be filed and any "reform" to the EAJA.

Some of the only teeth we have is to litigate this kind of crap, take that away, we're really McScrewed.
 
I am the chair of a county commission. Appointed by our county commissioners eight years ago now. Numerous times over the last decade, the Montana fish and game commission has embarrassed itself with little to no consequences regarding Montanan’s Right to Know, open meeting laws, and shady shit.
On the measly commission I’m on serving 10,000 or so people, we get called out on far less all the time.

When I want to see competency in government, it often seems to shine most in the local, and degrade the further it gets from that.

The things they can and cannot do are all in writing, and when in doubt they should lean toward being conservative with their power.


I know they have a difficult role, but can’t help but feel like what I’m watching is often outright f*ckery.

IMG_9929.jpeg
 
I am the chair of a county commission. Appointed by our county commissioners eight years ago now. Numerous times over the last decade, the Montana fish and game commission has embarrassed itself with little to no consequences regarding Montanan’s Right to Know, open meeting laws, and shady shit.
On the measly commission I’m on serving 10,000 or so people, we get called out on far less all the time.

When I want to see competency in government, it often seems to shine most in the local, and degrade the further it gets from that.

The things they can and cannot do are all in writing, and when in doubt they should lean toward being conservative with their power.


I know they have a difficult role, but can’t help but feel like what I’m watching is often outright f*ckery.

View attachment 357423
It seems the theme lately is politicians and their ilk can break rules/laws without consequences. Even winning lawsuits don’t have repercussions. It just continues as usual. I suspect we will see a lot more of the same in coming years.
 
Leupold BX-4 Rangefinding Binoculars

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
114,371
Messages
2,054,575
Members
36,570
Latest member
ihgodfather
Back
Top