I’m pretty good at judging Deer and Elk but Don’t have a lot of experience with Antelope.He was 15 1/2 if I remember correctly.
Thanks
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I’m pretty good at judging Deer and Elk but Don’t have a lot of experience with Antelope.He was 15 1/2 if I remember correctly.
I'm no antelope expert but I'm almost positive your buck doesn't score over 70 (maybe low 60s?) and setting a goal of 80 is rediculus unless your willing to eat a tag or you drew a south west Wyoming tag. 80 inches is a b and c book buck, pretty crazy expectations to expect to shoot a book buck.
I'm no expert and I've learned a lot listening to the folks above in this and other threads.
I am a pretty visual person, and i find i get more comfortable the more i study pictures of big bucks. This is a page i like to look at.
Login • Instagram
Welcome back to Instagram. Sign in to check out what your friends, family & interests have been capturing & sharing around the world.www.instagram.com
Feel free to judge the buck in my photo, I need lots of practice learning to field judge them.
View attachment 143153
I know the score on these...
Next 3 are the same buck:
I know the score on these...
Next 3 are the same buck:
Thanks BuzzH! How'd I do?
First buck (2 photos)
Horn length = 16" (the second photo shows the length of the tops)
Prong length = 6.25"
Base = 6.25"
1st Qtr = 7.5"
2nd Qtr = 3.75"
3rd Qtr = 2.25"
Total Score = 84" (82-86" ???)
Second buck (3 photos)
Horn length = 15.5"
Prong length = 7"
Base = 6.5"
1st Qtr = 8"
2nd Qtr = 5.5"
3rd Qtr = 3.75"
Total Score = 92.5" (91-94" ???)
I appreciate your "reality-check" perspective. 80+" IS a lofty goal, especially for an inexperienced pronghorn hunter like myself. But I don't think it is a ridiculous goal based on how Randy Newberg hunts pronghorn, and based on my conversation with the WGDF biologist and PMs with other forum members for the unit. By no means am I going to base the success of the hunt on whether or not I harvest an 80+" buck. I'm going to have fun and I'm going to try to shoot the biggest buck I can find.
The purpose of this thread is to get a better fundamental understanding of what goes into scoring pronghorn bucks so I can make an educated determination in the field this fall.
Also, based on my measurements, my OR buck scores 70.5" with 12" long horns. It's obviously not an official score but I highly doubt I'm over by 8-10"...
Could you please share just for educational purposes. Both are great ones but would be nice to get the measurements. First one looks about 15 tall and 5 1/2 inch prongs but hard to judge mass. The 2nd one has amazing character.I know the score on these...
Next 3 are the same buck:
I’m with Seeth on this one. You may have over measured a tad(although that isn’t the best picture for trying to score) AND setting a goal of 80” is a good way to come home empty handed, or with a buck that disappoints when you put the tape on him.I appreciate your "reality-check" perspective. 80+" IS a lofty goal, especially for an inexperienced pronghorn hunter like myself. But I don't think it is a ridiculous goal based on how Randy Newberg hunts pronghorn, and based on my conversation with the WGDF biologist and PMs with other forum members for the unit. By no means am I going to base the success of the hunt on whether or not I harvest an 80+" buck. I'm going to have fun and I'm going to try to shoot the biggest buck I can find.
The purpose of this thread is to get a better fundamental understanding of what goes into scoring pronghorn bucks so I can make an educated determination in the field this fall.
Also, based on my measurements, my OR buck scores 70.5" with 12" long horns. It's obviously not an official score but I highly doubt I'm over by 8-10"...