Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Guess I can't get away with wearing my glasses.
I wrote this article without any specific intention besides playing the guy no one wants at the trail. Just trying to imagine what some people might argue. hypothetical scenarios. I know that there are many contentious issues that are constantly pushed. Agendas are pushed all the time by groups comparing apples to giraffes. Look at Washington bear.How have I misunderstood you? You posted what appears to be a form letter to influence readers. Whatās your intent?
Question 1 - No.
Question 2 - I didnāt anything about airstrips. Tell me more about why you mention it.
Question 3 - Huh? Yes, e-bikes can be taken off pavementā¦
Are you just visiting? Please share more details and ask clear questions.
The extra hand for making sure to get down the trail before these hikers... it's a game changerGotta eat...
I wrote this article without any specific intention besides playing the guy no one wants at the trail. Just trying to imagine what some people might argue. hypothetical scenarios. I know that there are many contentious issues that are constantly pushed. Agendas are pushed all the time by groups comparing apples to giraffes. Look at Washington bear.
2. I think we can all agree that there are only a few airstrips in wilderness areas. However, this still raises a question: Why is it acceptable to use a motor in an airplane, a helicopter, or a jet boat, but not in ebike? Is this just a historical precedent that we have accepted without questioning? If we want to preserve the wilderness areas as pristine and primitive, we should apply the same standard to all forms of transportation. No motors should be allowed inside designated wilderness bottom line? across the board right?
3. You can explain to me the difference between a moped and an e-bike, since you seem to have a clear distinction in mind.
I am currently visiting (chatting) from Montana, where I was born and bred. Not too sure why that is important. We are all visitors on this land until we end up in a box or a can.
Its nice to see that everyone agrees that motorized roads are acceptable, but trails and off road usage is not.
I was slightly disappointed that no one mentioned the Wilderness Act. which was enacted to recognized the importance of these areas. designating them as forever wilderness, and safeguarding them from these issues. To just let wild places be wild.
However, with respect to the 1964 Wilderness Act (there you are, Visiting Hunter) those things don't involve a motor.Saxx performance underwear, crappy tasting goo energy shots, and sliced bread into this discussion? Technically, theyāre all technological advancements.
It doesn't even involve wheels.However, with respect to the 1964 Wilderness Act (there you are, Visiting Hunter) those things don't involve a motor.
2. I think we can all agree that there are only a few airstrips in wilderness areas. However, this still raises a question: Why is it acceptable to use a motor in an airplane, a helicopter, or a jet boat, but not in ebike? Is this just a historical precedent that we have accepted without questioning? If we want to preserve the wilderness areas as pristine and primitive, we should apply the same standard to all forms of transportation. No motors should be allowed inside designated wilderness bottom line? across the board right?
No it doesn't at all. I was just playing the other side. Thank you It was a compromise worth making considering the scrutiny during the timeThe airstrips being left in the FCW and the SBW, was part of the compromise to gain wilderness designation from primitive area designation. If it bothers you so much, there is a process to remove those airstips. Knock yourself out, and report back when you are successful.
The rest of your arguments are just as lame, so can we be done now?No it doesn't at all. I was just playing the other side. Thank you It was a compromise worth making considering the scrutiny during the time
Some can play the devil's advocate ("other side") and generate thought provoking lively discussion. Others merely muddle the issue with unclear expressions and don't seem to be sure of what their position may be. At this juncture in the thread and the somewhat negative feedback you have received ... Visiting Hunter, you decide the effect of your discussion as "devil's advocate".No it doesn't at all. I was just playing the other side. Thank you It was a compromise worth making considering the scrutiny during the time
I laugh but itās so true..Mtmuley, I agree. Itās a case by case basis. Why donāt we lump 4 wheel drive trucks, Saxx performance underwear, crappy tasting goo energy shots, and sliced bread into this discussion? Technically, theyāre all technological advancements.
There was another thread with like 3-4 of these pics lol if you know which thread can you tag me in it???I wrote this article without any specific intention besides playing the guy no one wants at the trail. Just trying to imagine what some people might argue. hypothetical scenarios. I know that there are many contentious issues that are constantly pushed. Agendas are pushed all the time by groups comparing apples to giraffes. Look at Washington bear.
2. I think we can all agree that there are only a few airstrips in wilderness areas. However, this still raises a question: Why is it acceptable to use a motor in an airplane, a helicopter, or a jet boat, but not in ebike? Is this just a historical precedent that we have accepted without questioning? If we want to preserve the wilderness areas as pristine and primitive, we should apply the same standard to all forms of transportation. No motors should be allowed inside designated wilderness bottom line? across the board right?
3. You can explain to me the difference between a moped and an e-bike, since you seem to have a clear distinction in mind.
I am currently visiting (chatting) from Montana, where I was born and bred. Not too sure why that is important. We are all visitors on this land until we end up in a box or a can.
Its nice to see that everyone agrees that motorized roads are acceptable, but trails and off road usage is not.
I was slightly disappointed that no one mentioned the Wilderness Act. which was enacted to recognized the importance of these areas. designating them as forever wilderness, and safeguarding them from these issues. To just let wild places be wild.
Think it's just on page 7 possibly.. unless there was a different one and I didn't see that thread..There was another thread with like 3-4 of these pics lol if you know which thread can you tag me in it???