I like to point out how often our hunting, fishing, and conservation issues get solved in a bipartisan manner. This is a good example that is part of the Montana history of our delegation working on these kind of things, regardless of party. I can't give insight as to the level of bipartisan support other state delegations provide on hunting, fishing, and conservation issues, but the history Montana has on these efforts keeps my idealist senses alive that our issues are not partisan.
http://billingsgazette.com/news/sta...24b43505.html#tracking-source=home-the-latest
Thinking about the Montana legacy on these issues, I recall when Conrad Burns won his Senate seat on the platform of "No Net Gain" and many other less than favorable positions. In spite of a sporadic track record and a less than stellar reputation for concern of those who may not have been his core base, Burns came around to the idea of large landscape conservation, fighting the DC resistance to fund some of the most critical projects of the last twenty years. Before he passed, he was interviewed and asked what he found most gratifying of his time in the Senate. When he listed his landscape funding efforts as being toward the top, it made me smile; a "No Net Gainer," over time and through respectful engagement, became a reliable vote on large landscape issues.
http://billingsgazette.com/news/sta...24b43505.html#tracking-source=home-the-latest
Thinking about the Montana legacy on these issues, I recall when Conrad Burns won his Senate seat on the platform of "No Net Gain" and many other less than favorable positions. In spite of a sporadic track record and a less than stellar reputation for concern of those who may not have been his core base, Burns came around to the idea of large landscape conservation, fighting the DC resistance to fund some of the most critical projects of the last twenty years. Before he passed, he was interviewed and asked what he found most gratifying of his time in the Senate. When he listed his landscape funding efforts as being toward the top, it made me smile; a "No Net Gainer," over time and through respectful engagement, became a reliable vote on large landscape issues.