Addicting
Well-known member
How many of those babies will be named Corona?
Depends on how many of them are conceived from drinking Corona!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How many of those babies will be named Corona?
Trudeau's (Canadian prime minister) wife tested positive for it. I don't want to sound like a tin-foil hat wearin, gonna-start-bottlin' air conspiracy theorist but does anyone else find it odd that so many celebrity types are all the sudden testing positive? I mean, most celebrities live a pretty guarded life. I understand they attend large functions but reported cases in Canada and Australia (Hanks) are low. Just seems odd. Like we are way, way off on the numbers across the entire globe.
You should go see a doctor and get diagnosed, the earlier the betterIf I get a fever and start hacking up stuff I will just stay home from work for a few days. Probably won't even go to the doctor to be diagnosed.
Lmao, drinking corona?Depends on how many of them are conceived from drinking Corona!
There are 100,000+ known cases, the experts know with the lag and the logarithmic grow curve that there are 1,000,000 who just haven't became sick enough to be counted, they expect 20-60% of the planet to be exposed in 4 months, 7.5 billion isn't a useful number given the population centers of India, Africa and South America haven't yet been effected meaningfully yet, celebs travel more, are around bigger groups more, shake more hands, are more likely to get quick treatment given money and status, and their names are recognizable. If you want to run the math on how many "famous names" we might recognize, and how many non-famous people live in similar areas and have similar lifestyles and find the number of infections for both populations and then find a mathematical disparity I will apologize, but other wise this is complete and utter hogwash.I didn’t want to be the first accused of the tin foil hat but I’ve been thinking the same. There are 7.53 billion people on earth and it seems a disproportionate amount who have the virus are well known people. It points to one of two possibilities, either this is a global conspiracy for a one world government (that’s a joke sorta) or there are 10,100,1000 times as many cases as we think.
The CDC and Mayo answer is you should call your doctor and get their advice for next steps. Even if you have a high fever that won't "break" (101+) and have some difficulty breathing you are still supposed to call first so they can direct you to the right place. Of course if you actually can't breath or have a fever over 103+ someone should call 911.You should go see a doctor and get diagnosed, the earlier the better
There are 100,000+ known cases, the experts know with the lag and the logarithmic grow curve that there are 1,000,000 who just haven't became sick enough to be counted, they expect 20-60% of the planet to be exposed in 4 months, 7.5 billion isn't a useful number given the population centers of India, Africa and South America haven't yet been effected meaningfully yet, celebs travel more, are around bigger groups more, shake more hands, are more likely to get quick treatment given money and status, and their names are recognizable. If you want to run the math on how many "famous names" we might recognize, and how many non-famous people live in similar areas and have similar lifestyles and find the number of infections for both populations and then find a mathematical disparity I will apologize, but other wise this is complete and utter hogwash.
All corona and influenza viruses are airborne - the question is how long and under what conditions.Another and better article referencing that study.
“For this study, researchers used a nebulizer device to put samples of the new virus into the air, imitating what might happen if an infected person coughed or made the virus airborne some other way.
The found that viable virus could be detected up to three hours later in the air, up to four hours on copper, up to 24 hours on cardboard and up to two to three days on plastic and stainless steel.”
Novel Coronavirus Can Live on Some Surfaces for Up to 3 Days, New Tests Show
The new coronavirus can also live in the air for several hours, tests by U.S. government and other scientists have foundtime.com
I am starting to think the fellow on the Joe Rogan podcast was right when he said it was airborne
If you give me the list of 80,000 Chinese names infected and a list of the famous Chinese in the relevant region of china I will do the math.There are over 80,000 people in China alone infected, how many were famous in China? Can you show me a headline?
All corona and influenza viruses are airborne - the question is how long and under what conditions.
I don't know, and frankly they won't have much statistically useful data for some time. I would guess +/-0.5% error rate for such a quickly developed assay, but I would guess sample preparation/handling error is a bigger part of the error rate than technical test capabilities. All medical testing has an error rate - it is the normal governing all testing. Seems like low impact in this situation. For example lets assume 0.5% error rate (meaning 0.025% false positive and 0.025% false negative) applied to the MN data that was announced yesterday. Those results showed 319 sick people (not general population) tested with 9 ending up positive. The statistics tell is that less than one of the 9 could be a false positive and less than one of the 310 could be a false negative, but probably one of the results is wrong. So does anything change if the results where 8 out of 319, 9 out of 319 or 10 out of 319? Not at a public health level it doesn't. Of course for the individual error it sucks, but nothing is 100% in the world.
U been watching to much of the view brent?The CDC would be the logical place to coordinate this, but you know who cut you know what, so they aren't exactly running on full strength
The official line early on in the reporting on the coronavirus said that it cannot be transmitted via the air. That doesn’t seem to be the case, and That’s why I shared it.
Aside from the book insta-fame promotion, airborne transmission is accurate... That's the directive we've received though... to each his her own.I am starting to think the fellow on the Joe Rogan podcast was right when he said it was airborne
If you want to go down this road at least accurately refer to it has a "flu with attitude" as it kicks the flu's ass headsup.If there wasnt a test for coronavirus someone would of started a thread titled "dang it's a bad flu season" because that's all this is and it's a relatively wussy flu.