noharleyyet
Well-known member
Why would technological methodology mitigation of take advantages not be comparable..semantics?
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Oh boy; a whole bunch of semantics there. The OP was urging comments on e-bikes on non-motorized BLM trails. Example of clear semantics: "I oppose the use of e-bikes on non-motorized BLM roads and trails."Then we also should clarify that "Wilderness" (with a capital "W") does not equal "Non-motorized Trails". There's lots of trails currently classified as non-motorized that are on public lands that are not designated as Wilderness Areas. I bring this up not to nit-pick semantics, but to clarify my opinion on the OP issue of "E-bikes on Non-motorized Trails". I do not support e-bikes (or any bikes for that matter) in designated Wilderness Areas. Neither is currently allowed, and I think that policy should continue. I am, however, in favor of e-bikes being allowed on public land trails otherwise open to conventional bikes. I understand and respect that others have different opinions on even that change. Valid arguments can be made on both sides.
No, that’s a dork.Is this an e-bike?
View attachment 141371
I did a quick search and didn't see this posted yet. Comment period is open now:
https://www.regulations.gov/document?D=BLM-2020-0001-0001
Even though the rule would allow local managers to have the final decision, I would rather just block it nationally. E-bikes are motor bikes and they have plenty of trails open to them. There are all kinds of specifics about which kind of e-bikes would be allowed, but who is going to enforce them? BLM doesn't have the resources to monitor trails and check the wattage on e-bikes. If you can't pedal up a trail, pick an easier trail or get a motor bike and use it on the roads/trails open to motor bikes.