You’re absolutely right. To be fair there are plenty of Dem officials saying exactly the same thing as you, get back to middle America, kitchen table issues. Question is whether the leadership will listen.
I remember that, and yet she still won the next election quite handily.
i'm not saying in the grand scheme this law will touch hunting as is. but what about the browning BAR semi auto? now would be illegal? I know out west probably 90% use bolt action guns but still there are those that do not
Believing that the definition/usage of "a regulated militia" in colonial times as compared today doesn't matter is disingenuous. The intent, which should be as clear today as it was then, is to provide the citizens of our country with the ability to stand against tyranny. That included weapons in military usage at the time. The idea that people would not have the ability to have contemporary weapons with which to hunt and feed themselves isn't something the founders could have even thought possible. Myself, like many others in this forum I believe, do use weapons that would fit into this prohibition to hunt various (including big game) species. As a resident of Colorado, given the current and recent political climate, if you would pose that this is not merely another attempt/step to try and prohibit or ridiculously limit the ownership of firearms in general you are either being untruthful with yourself or you are fine with those restrictions but won't come out and say it.
