I have a tough time getting my dander up at any manufactured crisis.
Can we all agree that killing Cecil was probably illegal, unethical and certainly unneeded from a PR perspective within the hunting community? Especially by a poacher with a history of canned hunts and illegally harvested game?
Can we all agree that killing Cecil was probably illegal, unethical and certainly unneeded from a PR perspective within the hunting community? Especially by a poacher with a history of canned hunts and illegally harvested game?