MT had a Director appointed by the Commission (rather than the Gov) at one time, but a bi-partisan effort to take powers from the Commission succeeded in the 1980s. We previously had a Director hired and fired by the Commission, not the Governor. We previously had autonomy of the Commission to implement many policies that now require legislative approval.
I know this is a likely pipe dream to demand a Governor or Legislature (controlled by either side) to give up powers they currently have. But, changing how our Director is hired/fired, who they are accountable to, and where policy is vested wouldn't require changing the state Constitution. Not sure if that would improve our current status, but there was a time when our wildlife policy was not held so tightly in the grasp of the politicians.
No need to elect Commissioners. No need to change the Constitution. Surely not perfect and likely impractical but maybe it could be an improvement.
I know this is a likely pipe dream to demand a Governor or Legislature (controlled by either side) to give up powers they currently have. But, changing how our Director is hired/fired, who they are accountable to, and where policy is vested wouldn't require changing the state Constitution. Not sure if that would improve our current status, but there was a time when our wildlife policy was not held so tightly in the grasp of the politicians.
No need to elect Commissioners. No need to change the Constitution. Surely not perfect and likely impractical but maybe it could be an improvement.