A-con
New member
Went up to the range to shoot some Nosler Accubonds today, with mixed results,
Accuracy was very good, with some groups as small as 1.3 inches at 200 yds (.65 MOA)
All groups with the Accubonds were very good, no load went over 1 MOA
Velocity was a different story, the Accubonds seemed to be slower that the other loads I was playing with, (Hornadys & Nosler Partitions )
All bullets were 225 gr , .338s out of my Ruger ( see camo stock pics in thr Rifle section )
With the same loads, the boat tail Accubonds averaged about 100 fps slower, and I can't figure out why. The Accubond is a longer bullet, and I had to seat it deeper, which should have caused higher pressures & higher velocitys. The hottest load I tried, 72.3 IMR 4350 was poaking along at 2765 fps, while the partitions were hitting high 2800s and even one in the low 2900s
The Partitions were accurate enough, shooting right at .9 MOA.
Why would the Accubonds be so much slower ?
<FONT COLOR="#800080" SIZE="1">[ 05-25-2003 18:04: Message edited by: Anaconda ]</font>
Accuracy was very good, with some groups as small as 1.3 inches at 200 yds (.65 MOA)
All groups with the Accubonds were very good, no load went over 1 MOA
Velocity was a different story, the Accubonds seemed to be slower that the other loads I was playing with, (Hornadys & Nosler Partitions )
All bullets were 225 gr , .338s out of my Ruger ( see camo stock pics in thr Rifle section )
With the same loads, the boat tail Accubonds averaged about 100 fps slower, and I can't figure out why. The Accubond is a longer bullet, and I had to seat it deeper, which should have caused higher pressures & higher velocitys. The hottest load I tried, 72.3 IMR 4350 was poaking along at 2765 fps, while the partitions were hitting high 2800s and even one in the low 2900s
The Partitions were accurate enough, shooting right at .9 MOA.
Why would the Accubonds be so much slower ?
<FONT COLOR="#800080" SIZE="1">[ 05-25-2003 18:04: Message edited by: Anaconda ]</font>