Justabirdwatcher
Well-known member
That's nearly published velocity for a 24" barrel. You got lucky with a fast barrel!Varget
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's nearly published velocity for a 24" barrel. You got lucky with a fast barrel!Varget
So you actually did listen to your father the boomer.There are a number of arguments in favor of the 6.5 CM. The ones I accept have to do with OAL as it relates to high BC bullets in traditional short actions, availability for the MSR crowd, better shoulder angle for reloaders and greater inherent accuracy.
But for a hunting round, I have to say (after owning and loading for several 6.5 CM's) - I fail to see the point of this cartridge.
Now, please don't take me for an old curmudgeon or worse yet, respond with "okay boomer" (being a proud Gen-X), but why on God's green earth would any hunter choose a 6.5 CM over a .308 or 7mm-08, or even a .260 or .243? When you compare the 6.5 CM to the .308 and 7mm-08 in practical hunting applications, it fails to measure up in almost any way.
Okay, sure, some might argue recoil. But is there really any noticeable difference between the recoil of a common 143-grain 6.5 CM and an also common 139-grain 7mm-08 round? Not only is there NOT, but the 7mm-08 bullet is always going to be traveling 100-200 fps. faster AND create a bigger hole.
The argument so many of us 7mm-08 fans have used to answer the .308 crowd for so long now, is lower recoil and higher BC (resulting in similar downrange ballistics beyond 300 yards) but let's face it, most folks will never in their lives shoot at a game animal beyond 200 yards.
Is this just a fascination with something "new?" Is it a marketing thing? What gives? Why on earth has the 6.5 CM taken up so much shelf space, seemingly overnight, when so many more effective hunting cartridges already exist?
Prc shoots about the same. 140 game kings at 3100 fps. Creedmoor is heavy to pack compared to my PRC.Is your PRC shooting that well and is it an equivalent rifle for hunting?
Well then there you have it. Sell that piece of chit CM and buy another 6.5PRC. Bird feeder is right - there’s no use for them.Prc shoots about the same. 140 game kings at 3100 fps. Creedmoor is heavy to pack compared to my PRC.
My father wasn't a boomer.So you actually did listen to your father the boomer.
Only seems right since big bird sold a gun over being 4oz heavier than advertisedWell then there you have it. Sell that piece of chit CM and buy another 6.5PRC. Bird feeder is right - there’s no use for them.
Ya sorry, hate to break it to you but that will just bounce off the front shoulder of even a spike. Totally not suitable for elk hunting.View attachment 356540View attachment 356541
First three 107 tmk’s out of this gun. Cheap savage. Ease to get to shoot might be a reason someone would hunt with creedmoor.
FFS maybe you should tattle and fill out a hurt feelings report. If you can’t humor the hedgehog name, my condolences.I wonder how Big fin feels about members making fun of people's screen names.
It’s easy enough to askI wonder how Big fin feels about members making fun of people's screen names.
Nah, I left jr. high behind, where it belonged. Maybe you should as well.FFS maybe you should tattle and fill out a hurt feelings report. If you can’t humor the hedgehog name, my condolences.
The Internet is jr highNah, I left jr. high behind, where it belonged. Maybe you should as well.
that's fairThe Internet is jr high