VikingsGuy
Well-known member
Yup - it goes hand in hand with worrying a lot that a criminal in the act of committing a violent crime gets shot - sorry but but once a person starts committing a violent felony my concern for the criminal’s safety goes way down. I fully support the castle doctrine. While in MN there is a castle doctrine, my understanding is that the home owner still has the burden to prove there was no other alternative. Seems like the benefit of the doubt should go to the home owner not the criminal. Just to be clear - I don’t support chasing down a criminal or otherwise shooting someone who is no longer a threat.This type of thinking is fairly common left of center.