SAJ-99
Well-known member
I would like to see him go on the record with his views, and GG for that matter. Silence is acceptance.I sent a letter to our Montana AG and it seemed to be positively received.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I would like to see him go on the record with his views, and GG for that matter. Silence is acceptance.I sent a letter to our Montana AG and it seemed to be positively received.
Respectfully disagree. Subsidies by gov't reduce competition, favor chosen industries over their potential competitors, Charging market price for grazing, extraction, wind and solar on federal lands would provide a great increase in income for USFS and BLM (grossly and chronically underfunded), reduce other (income) taxes for Americans, It would reveal true market costs of each subsidized industry and allow the market to choose based on value, not gov't influence. Costs of oil, gas, minerals and grazing would increase, benefitting their competitors including private landowners and 'greener' energy. The gov't heavily subsidizing big oil is bad for the planet. 2024 was the hottest year in recorded history, by a wide margin. Another year of record profits for big oil, profits directly attributed to these gov't subsidies. The most important question in public policy is Qui Bono, Who Benefits? Taxpayers are generously donating to big oil profits through subsidies of discounted lease rates, as well as paying for fuel. That is how the game is rigged.Every american consumer is benefitted by the low prices of commercial leasing/activity on public land. It seems pretty clear the economic benefit of the low federal rates exceeds what the typical person pays in taxes.