jryoung
Well-known member
Let's hope Mike Lee doesn't end up as AG.
12 states join Utah
- Thread starter brocksw
- Start date
appaloosa
Well-known member
Not at all surprised to see the entire Freedom Caucus in Wyoming sign on to this crap. How that clown show continues to gain support in Wyoming is a total mystery to me.
Aperventure
Active member
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2018
- Messages
- 139
Or worse, on the Supreme Court ruling on this case
BuzzH
Well-known member
Because people vote them in.
MTelkHuntress
Well-known member
Commissioners decline to support Utah lawsuit over BLM lands - Bitterroot Star
by Michael Howell In a two to one vote, the Ravalli County Commissioners recently rejected a resolution expressing support for the State of Utah lawsuit before the U. S. Supreme […]
Ravalli County Commissioners recently discussed whether or not to support the lawsuit. Thankfully they voted 'no' in the end but the discussion was interesting.
"Commissioner Greg Chilcott spoke repeatedly in favor of the resolution. In moving to approve the resolution, he said, “Distilled down to the basic question, the question that’s being asked is whether the federal government can hold unappropriated lands. There’s a lot in there, but at the end of the day the question is, can they hold unappropriated land? It has long been argued on both sides as to where state sovereignty falls in this. Can states manage lands? In some cases, I don’t think states can. But these are unappropriated lands… The question is not whether they can be taken out of public ownership. In fact Utah has expressed that it is not their intent to take public lands and make them private… But I think the states in some cases can manage public lands and I believe personally that the best management is management that is closest to home. I think it’s a question that’s been out there for decades and it’s time to put it to bed one way or the other.”"
SAJ-99
Well-known member
That’s a word salad. A true politician.Commissioners decline to support Utah lawsuit over BLM lands - Bitterroot Star
by Michael Howell In a two to one vote, the Ravalli County Commissioners recently rejected a resolution expressing support for the State of Utah lawsuit before the U. S. Supreme […]bitterrootstar.com
Ravalli County Commissioners recently discussed whether or not to support the lawsuit. Thankfully they voted 'no' in the end but the discussion was interesting.
"Commissioner Greg Chilcott spoke repeatedly in favor of the resolution. In moving to approve the resolution, he said, “Distilled down to the basic question, the question that’s being asked is whether the federal government can hold unappropriated lands. There’s a lot in there, but at the end of the day the question is, can they hold unappropriated land? It has long been argued on both sides as to where state sovereignty falls in this. Can states manage lands? In some cases, I don’t think states can. But these are unappropriated lands… The question is not whether they can be taken out of public ownership. In fact Utah has expressed that it is not their intent to take public lands and make them private… But I think the states in some cases can manage public lands and I believe personally that the best management is management that is closest to home. I think it’s a question that’s been out there for decades and it’s time to put it to bed one way or the other.”"
Utah’s only after BLM lands now….
wyofile.com
Utah: We’re no longer asking Supreme Court to ‘dispose’ of public BLM land - WyoFile
Beehive State’s latest court papers mark a ‘seismic shift,’ attorney says, in its 18.5M-acre ‘land-grab’ suit.
wyofile.com
appaloosa
Well-known member
They are panicking now because someone reminded them that the state can't actually acquire anymore federal lands. So, if the federal government is forced to dispose of it, it might go on the auction block and be available to anyone.
So, now they are backtracking and trying to figure out what they actually want should the SC rule it unconstitutional.
Effing clown show in Utah!
So, now they are backtracking and trying to figure out what they actually want should the SC rule it unconstitutional.
Effing clown show in Utah!
As I had said from the beginning- the original filing was a pie-in-the-sky overreach, and it may have been strategically so.
This shift to specifically target unappropriated BLM makes it much more of a realistic possibility.
Gird your loins, boys- the Doge bros are coming soon to a state near you.
This shift to specifically target unappropriated BLM makes it much more of a realistic possibility.
Gird your loins, boys- the Doge bros are coming soon to a state near you.
Last edited:
BuzzH
Well-known member
The "Doge boys" have less authority than a city dog catcher. Unpaid advisory committee that just got a lesson/schooled on CR's and trying to shut down the government.
Real impressive...and so effective.
Agreed. But for right now anyway, they have substantial political leverage.
We have seen Congress and the SC do the bidding of a cult of personality out of fear in the past- we may or may not again here soon. It will be very interesting to see how this plays out.
(Also- I am using “Doge Bros” as a pejorative here…)
Last edited:
BuzzH
Well-known member
Doge bros are not a problem, toothless dogs, freedom caucus and alt-right? Different beast there.
Southern Elk
Well-known member
So they had a change of heart?
From the article…
Compared to Utah’s initial complaint, the latest filing is “a much softer request … a much weaker ask than the headlines have made out,” Semerad wrote in an email. “In the end, Utah just wants the Court to tell Congress that it must give the Secretary of the Interior more leeway to sell off or transfer lands, eventually.”
From the article…
Compared to Utah’s initial complaint, the latest filing is “a much softer request … a much weaker ask than the headlines have made out,” Semerad wrote in an email. “In the end, Utah just wants the Court to tell Congress that it must give the Secretary of the Interior more leeway to sell off or transfer lands, eventually.”
No change of heart; same goal, just different tactics with what they are betting will be a friendlier crowd, where Congress can write a wide open piece of legislation compared to a judiciary that might place sideboards and specifics if, big if, they were to side with Utah.
