RidgeRunner76
Active member
I've got 3 youth hunters. Both my daughters carry .243's and son carries a 7-08. All work well for deer and elk.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I disagree with the idea longer barrel and more weight. IMO, there are easier/better ways to mitigate muzzle blast. A rifle that long and heavy is just tougher for a kid to handle, whether that be carrying it over hill and dale or just getting in on a rest, or out of the case.Seems like everyone agrees on calibers but I think it's also important to get a rifle that is heavy enough. I can see wanting to give a youth or person of smaller stature a small light rifle that will be easy to carry, but having something of moderate weight with a decently long barrel will also greatly reduce recoil and muzzle blast. I would give a youth a 9.5-10 lb .270 with a 24 inch barrel way before a 5.5 lb 6.5 creedmore or .243 with a short barrel.
IMO, there are easier/better ways to mitigate muzzle blast.
Ear plugs, muffs, load selection to start with. With both my 10yo and 7yo, noise is a bigger problem than the physical recoil and more so during practice sessions. A 10# rifle is almost 20% of my youngest's body weight. #3 is a big deal for him in safely handling, carrying, or moving a firearm. Even is for my 10yo who is big for his age, just not as big of a deal.Such as? Honestly I think a lot of people these days are getting sucked in to the super light mountain rifle/ ultralight synthetic craze to the determent of their shooting. An extra 3lbs makes a world of difference shooting and really isn't that big of a deal when your walking around.
Ear plugs, muffs, load selection to start with. With both my 10yo and 7yo, noise is a bigger problem than the physical recoil and more so during practice sessions. A 10# rifle is almost 20% of my youngest's body weight. #3 is a big deal for him in safely handling, carrying, or moving a firearm. Even is for my 10yo who is big for his age, just not as big of a deal.
How many kids have you taken to the range/hunting and seen better results from a 10# rifle vs. a 7#?
Thanks everyone,I have some thinking to do.He has shot one deer with a 20 Guage slug gun.He also killed a nice long beard when he was 8 with a 20 guage.And he's shot 22s a bit to get use to a scope and shooting.He's fairly big for his age,5ft 105lbs.I'm thinking the reduced recoil loads make sense.The 243 I worry wouldn't be a good elk choice.I forgot about a 7-08,and am leaning that direction.I'll definitely make sure I find a rifle that fits him
While I doubt I'd sweat my son carrying a 243, the 708 would be a good choice as well. I went with the 243 because, at the time, only .243" and .308" calibers were legal on private land in Indiana. With some judicious load selection, I cannot imagine a 708 causing him any trouble considering he's handled a 20gr slug successfully.Thanks everyone,I have some thinking to do.He has shot one deer with a 20 Guage slug gun.He also killed a nice long beard when he was 8 with a 20 guage.And he's shot 22s a bit to get use to a scope and shooting.He's fairly big for his age,5ft 105lbs.I'm thinking the reduced recoil loads make sense.The 243 I worry wouldn't be a good elk choice.I forgot about a 7-08,and am leaning that direction.I'll definitely make sure I find a rifle that fits him