Gerald Martin
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2009
- Messages
- 8,694
They have a "right" to illegally possess a gun to protect themselves from danger in the country they fled to for safety because the danger in the country they left was overwhelming. Makes sense if you don't think about it!
The right to self-defense is a universal human right regardless of an individual’s immigration status. Seems like the defendant had a history of being a responsible gun owner and productive part of society. I would call the ruling a win for personal liberty.