Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Trying to understand what they were getting ready to do:
Were they thinking of changing it from a Limited Entry unit to a General Tag?
Nebraska must be following the Montana management program for mule deerWow they listen to people and adjust? What kind of nonsense is that?
Nebraska can’t figure out why our deer numbers are plummeting while advertising “it’s tag season” all over.
Hunters: deer numbers are way down.
NGPC: thanks for the feedback! We’ll increase antlerless tags to kill them off, when nobody can hunt, nobody can complain!
They survey was for public opinion on the proposal, not to make the decision. WG&F actually talks with stake holders in some instances on changes, LOs were not in favor.I think it's a dangerous thing to make conservation decisions on public surveys. These decisions need to come from wildlife biologists who study the data for a living, not on respondents preferences or desires.
Correct, there were a ton of issues with making that unit general.If it were entirely up to the bio it would probably be general, which would be a bad deal for that area.
How much do you know about unit 7? How many elk do you kill a year in that unit? How many of the landowners do you know? How many days a year you spend hunting it?My biggest concern is that at some point emotion will start to become the reason for how game is managed. It has already happened in some states, and that is all the anti hunting groups need. After that it's all about lobbying, and science goes out the window. Land owners, hunters, anti hunters, or and other groups have their own reasons or agendas, but there has to be a standard for what is best for the health of our wildlife as a resource, regardless of who is happy or not. We cannot allow emotions to rule out a sound conservation plan.
Right, so you have no experience in the area, have no idea who was pushing the general tag idea, but you're positive it's a slippery slope...and hunters should kneel to those that pushed the idea.I'm not complaining about anything. I am stating that it is a slippery slope to manage wildlife with the use of poling data rather than scientific data. It makes no difference what the area is.
*You'reSorry your so angry, but thank you for making my point about emotions.
When was it general?How much do you know about unit 7? How many elk do you kill a year in that unit? How many of the landowners do you know? How many days a year you spend hunting it?
Did you realize it's been general in the past and didn't work?
The people hunting 7 know what the problems would have been and why it didn't happen.
It was a bad idea that was being driven by the very things in your post that you're complaining about.