I think that can be a slippery slope; you often seen that argument used by those that love high priced auction tags and “conservation” groups as justification as to why they are needed to fund conservation and why they’re a better sportsman than the commonerWhy don't we think about it in terms of doing right by the resource? I think we should raise prices on everyone, pretty significantly, and use it for habitat and access. You guys are mostly engaged in a pissing match that has to do with ME ME ME. My ability to buy a tag, blah blah blah. Are tags too cheap? Clearly. Has habitat and access degraded? Duh!
Can we remember that the whole point of license fees is to support and improve the resource? Not to make sure blue collar individuals can afford their out of state hunts every year.