Tom
New member
Would you tell me if this conclusion is correct:
1. The wolf reintro is within the law.
2. The wolf reintro is supported by the majority of the people.
Based on the above 2 points, consideration to possible economic, ecological, or safety concerns were not considered - and need not have been considered - prior to the reintroduction.
A friend asked me that, I don't know much about it. Do you guys know?
*******************************************************
I guess ESA, how was that passed?, says reintroducing wolves is good, but how is it legal for a government program to kill people's cattle and sheep on a daily basis? How is it a pack of 20 wolves can roam freely? The habitat may not be big enough to make that be safe, then it would be illegal, right?
What do you guys know about these question? Got a good link for me?
What's the history of ESA? Was it popular support? How did it pass?
1. The wolf reintro is within the law.
2. The wolf reintro is supported by the majority of the people.
Based on the above 2 points, consideration to possible economic, ecological, or safety concerns were not considered - and need not have been considered - prior to the reintroduction.
A friend asked me that, I don't know much about it. Do you guys know?
*******************************************************
I guess ESA, how was that passed?, says reintroducing wolves is good, but how is it legal for a government program to kill people's cattle and sheep on a daily basis? How is it a pack of 20 wolves can roam freely? The habitat may not be big enough to make that be safe, then it would be illegal, right?
What do you guys know about these question? Got a good link for me?
What's the history of ESA? Was it popular support? How did it pass?