The Hedgehog
Well-known member
Looks like a regular cattle fence to me. Still glad they don't own the public inside it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So now the tactic is to pretend that people are not fired up about this topic and there are not page after page of posts regarding this topic? Interesting approach. If all the threads and posts were not readily available it might actually work. But since the threads and posts are there for everyone to read and when you see all the crazy talk in those posts there is really no reason to deny what is out therefore everyone to read.
If people were not fired up about this there would not be 16 pages of discussion desperately trying to find something illegal about the fence project. Everything from location, height, # of wires, danger to animals, toilet paper left on public land, where campers are parked, dozers, water runoff, etc....
Bunch of people all fired up about a "anti elk" fence and then several people point out that what they see in the pics is meant to line up posts not kill elk calves.
. ^^^ that's where I said people are fired up, notI think "a bunch of people all fired up"from fence pictures in posts ranging from #1-#379.
So now the tactic is to pretend that people are not fired up about this topic and there are not page after page of posts regarding this topic?
That 5 strand fencing should be illegal. Worst stuff ever for wildlife.
roadhunter, serious question. Do you work for Wilks Bros?
When the lower strands of wire are both close to the ground and to each other, they impede the movement of fawns and yearlings which tend to go under or through a fence.
If he does then the Wilks should ask for their money back.roadhunter, serious question. Do you work for Wilks Bros?
I was beginning to wonder about that myself. Notice you have not received and answer yet...
I was beginning to wonder about that myself. Notice you have not received and answer yet...
Your paranoia never ceases to amaze me. So now you think since I don't participate in your ridiculous witch hunt I much work for the Wilks. Hilarious. Keep up the fine work fellas. Deep down I hope for your sake you can find at least 1 law they broke so you can claim victory even if nothing is actually changed with the fence.
Where would I find an engineer to design one of these fences that keeps animals off of public land and on private land? Can you e-mail me some specs or contact info for the engineer who designed this 1 way elk fence?
Couldn't you make a case that the fence is designed to keep elk on public lands as well?
Take off your foil hat for a minute and try to make a logical argument that the fence is designed to keep elk on 1 side but not the other.
See how easy it is to poke holes in these conspiracy theories.
I've seen worse (with sheep mesh), but most I see aren't as bad the Wilks'. It appears to have already broken one elk leg.Looks like a regular cattle fence to me. Still glad they don't own the public inside it.
If he does then the Wilks should ask for their money back.
Now you want me to bet you if an elk will die in their fence? No idea why you think we should bet on that but it's yet another example of just how extreme some of the viewpoints have gotten. You are really grasping at this point. I don't have to prove anything to you. People are innocent until proven guilty in this country. it's your job to prove what the Wilks did was illegal. So far you have failed to do so as all this talk and pics including the investigation yielded nothing. Now things are getting more and more desperate. Even to the point of pretending that normal fence construction is a "1 way fence designed to keep elk off public land and designed to kill any elk who dares cross it". You might believe this is regular behavior but I can assure you to the average American this thread is hilarious.Care to place a bet on whether this fence will kill elk or not? Put your money where you mouth is. I will put up what ever you care to that there will be dead elk hanging from this fence in the future.
So a land owner is going to spend $$$ to fence public lands to keep elk on public? Show me a billionaire that would invest in such a fence?
Who said it was a conspiracy? the only person using words like conspiracy and tinfoil hats is you.
I don't care if they build a fence on their own land, I hope they clearly mark their property as they seem to be willing to do, I don't care if they buy the entire mountain range and every neighboring property, Their money is as green as anybody elses. Not a single word of that is what what was said here.
Believe as you wish but if the state is such stewards of the lands they have how come every session the Republicans sponsor a bill for no net gain in state own lands because,
"the state can't afford to manage the lands they have now". They are the very same people wanting the federal government to cede public lands to the state, because supposedly the state manages them better, both cannot be true.
The Wilks' are going to do what they want to do.
Nemont
Funny stuff there RH.Ha Ha. You still love talking about me. Obviously I have gotten to you and it shows in your posts.
That is why you are so eager to talk about me because all your discussions and pics of the fence have gotten you nowhere and since the article ran in the Billlings paper its' looking like a whole lot of nothing will happen over the fence.
I have to assume the Wilks asked MFWP which fences were most harmful to elk so they knew what to build. I just posted a link to FWP's recommendations on wildlife friendly fences - nothing like what was built.Supposedly they consulted FWP about the fence. So what gives? Did they ignore that consultation, FWP ignored the request, something else? Just curious about that piece of the puzzle here.
I have to assume the Wilks asked MFWP which fences were most harmful to elk so they knew what to build.
Let's test that theory. You just go ahead and shut up for a few days and see if we are so eager to talk with you that we invite you back.
Now you want me to bet you if an elk will die in their fence? No idea why you think we should bet on that but it's yet another example of just how extreme some of the viewpoints have gotten. You are really grasping at this point. I don't have to prove anything to you. People are innocent until proven guilty in this country. it's your job to prove what the Wilks did was illegal. So far you have failed to do so as all this talk and pics including the investigation yielded nothing. Now things are getting more and more desperate. Even to the point of pretending that normal fence construction is a "1 way fence designed to keep elk off public land and designed to kill any elk who dares cross it". You might believe this is regular behavior but I can assure you to the average American this thread is hilarious.
I have to assume the Wilks asked MFWP which fences were most harmful to elk so they knew what to build. .