npaden
Well-known member
Had a big long reply typed up on my iPhone to the last comment on the article but I can't post because I'm not a member of outdoor life's blog.
I'll just paste it here. If anyone wants to post this in the comments under the article for me that would be great.
Actually state lands are almost all significantly more restricted on access than federal land. Have you ever tried to camp on state land in Wyoming or New Mexico? You can't. Colorado only allows hunting on about 1/3rd of its state land and that is paid for by the parks and wildlife department. You can't do anything on Nevada's state land because they sold all except about 3,000 acres of the 3 million acres they were granted at statehood. If you want to hunt or fish or camp east of the Mississippi you better plan on either paying for that access or joining lots of others using the little state land that they have available for hunting. Requiring weed free seed and similar restrictions are pretty smart in my opinion. Sure there are some new roadless areas being created, but not nearly as many as there are subdivisions going in or oil and gas drilling on critical winter range for wildlife. The forest service, BLM, etc. are not perfect by any means, but managing hundreds of millions of acres for multi use activities is going to result in some folks not getting to use some of it in the way they would prefer. Overall it seems to work a lot better than local control would.
I'll just paste it here. If anyone wants to post this in the comments under the article for me that would be great.
Actually state lands are almost all significantly more restricted on access than federal land. Have you ever tried to camp on state land in Wyoming or New Mexico? You can't. Colorado only allows hunting on about 1/3rd of its state land and that is paid for by the parks and wildlife department. You can't do anything on Nevada's state land because they sold all except about 3,000 acres of the 3 million acres they were granted at statehood. If you want to hunt or fish or camp east of the Mississippi you better plan on either paying for that access or joining lots of others using the little state land that they have available for hunting. Requiring weed free seed and similar restrictions are pretty smart in my opinion. Sure there are some new roadless areas being created, but not nearly as many as there are subdivisions going in or oil and gas drilling on critical winter range for wildlife. The forest service, BLM, etc. are not perfect by any means, but managing hundreds of millions of acres for multi use activities is going to result in some folks not getting to use some of it in the way they would prefer. Overall it seems to work a lot better than local control would.