if i had to be bolted down somewhere, colorado still ain't a bad place to be stuck.
Yeah man, I could tough that out with a smile on my face too.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
if i had to be bolted down somewhere, colorado still ain't a bad place to be stuck.
I lived there about 20 years ago. It was wonderful. Now I go there to visit family and can't wait to leave. I-25 between FoCo and Pueblo is my hell.and i even with my very limited experience being further east than kansas it's not hard for me to agree.
colorado, besides objectively having some of the most beautiful and dramatic mountain scenery in the west and a lifetime of adventure that awaits amongst it, has long been turning into a real crock of shit. it's a stressful place to live, on every front. i'm pretty over it.
but as usual, all the immediate family is here - pretty well bolted down now starting to sprout little ones, whether i like it or not.
all that said, if i had to be bolted down somewhere, colorado is still very far from the worst place to be stuck.
The mule deer mismanagement discussion got me thinking. Well that, and I just finished watching Life on our Planet on Netflix. Does it really matter if we wipe out all the deer, elk, wolves and anything else that lives where people do?
Think about it for a minute. I will pick on massachusetts, only because it is the only other state I really know well. Much of it is sterile. Heck, hardly even have insects. I remember driving to the reservoir to fish with my dad as a kid. In ten minutes the windshield was full of dead bugs. Not anymore. Lucky if one bug gets sacrificed. Bats are gone. I notice that there are a fraction of the birds. Nobody really cares. And it has no impact on anyone's life. No bugs is a good thing right? All we need really are a bunch of breweries, bars and restaurants. It is the modern day jungle.
We don't need wildlife. We don't use them for food anymore. If anything, they're pests. Deer eat our gardens. Coyotes eat our pets.
During the last 4 billion years we have had plenty of mass extinctions. Maybe we are part of the process of the next one.
I love the outdoors. I love animals. But much of that is due to the fact that I love to hunt. I certainly don't need to hunt. I can get what I need from the grocery store. Maybe these pesky animals everywhere and open lands need to make way for the next stage of the planet's life where there is nothing left but humans.
Maybe I'm actually the problem. I'm holding onto this nostalgic idea that for some reason is still lingering in my dna. The modern man doesn't hunt. He doesn't live in nature. He does not cherish his tools to harvest animals.
Deer have no place in Worcester or Boston. Why should we have them anywhere in between?
We don't need wildlife. We don't use them for food anymore. If anything, they're pests. Deer eat our gardens. Coyotes eat our pets.
But the cost of that meat is pretty high, looking at the cost of ALL tags/harvest, although I'm sure some will take the view that only their cost should matter, which is kind of ironic. I think eventually everything has a dollar value- elk, deer, snail darters, some plant only found in one spot, whatever. They all have an implicit dollar value assigned now, but eventually it will be explicit. We will have to make hard choices on what can be saved. In addition, maybe we take a look at the part of NAM that eliminated selling wild game. I am skeptical much can save this planet from humans in the long run.Speak for yourself, I have enough red meat for my family for a year in my freezers right now...
You're probably right, and all good points. Especially since I don't have kids, sometimes I find myself slipping into this attitude...that there's no way we can reverse course now, so why even try?I am skeptical much can save this planet from humans in the long run.
and i even with my very limited experience being further east than kansas it's not hard for me to agree.
colorado, besides objectively having some of the most beautiful and dramatic mountain scenery in the west and a lifetime of adventure that awaits amongst it, has long been turning into a real crock of shit. it's a stressful place to live, on every front. i'm pretty over it.
but as usual, all the immediate family is here - pretty well bolted down now starting to sprout little ones, whether i like it or not.
all that said, if i had to be bolted down somewhere, colorado is still very far from the worst place to be stuck.
This, I believe is partially true. The problem is when people talk about Colorado as a whole, they are really talking about the I-25/I-70 corridor. There are a ton of cool places that are outside of this area that don't get the crowds and are nice places to live (if you can find work, etc.). I've got a buddy who lives in Norwood. That place is sweet.and i even with my very limited experience being further east than kansas it's not hard for me to agree.
colorado, besides objectively having some of the most beautiful and dramatic mountain scenery in the west and a lifetime of adventure that awaits amongst it, has long been turning into a real crock of shit. it's a stressful place to live, on every front. i'm pretty over it.
but as usual, all the immediate family is here - pretty well bolted down now starting to sprout little ones, whether i like it or not.
all that said, if i had to be bolted down somewhere, colorado is still very far from the worst place to be stuck.
This, I believe is partially true. The problem is when people talk about Colorado as a whole, they are really talking about the I-25/I-70 corridor. There are a ton of cool places that are outside of this area that don't get the crowds and are nice places to live (if you can find work, etc.). I've got a buddy who lives in Norwood. That place is sweet.
Going into Denver only about once every couple of years it still blows my mind how fast its expanding. I have never seen a place blow up like it has.that's ridiculous, it's an enchanting place to live...
View attachment 306119View attachment 306121
View attachment 306122
View attachment 306123View attachment 306125
View attachment 306127
View attachment 306128
View attachment 306129
View attachment 306130
Going into Denver only about once every couple of years it still blows my mind how fast its expanding. I have never seen a place blow up like it has.
I've never met Gus, but he's still one of my favorite dogs..It's a great thread topic but man do people over look the urban areas/urban interface for wildlife. I don't have pics but I watched bald eagles fishing in the seaport and saw a peregrine outside MGH.
and yeah all of these were taken in here over the course of 2 years.
View attachment 306105
I think there aren't many western cities you could get ducks, turkey, deer, and pheasant on public land within 45 min of downtown.
View attachment 306100
View attachment 306101
View attachment 306102
View attachment 306103
Jeez nacy, have a snickers.The mule deer mismanagement discussion got me thinking. Well that, and I just finished watching Life on our Planet on Netflix. Does it really matter if we wipe out all the deer, elk, wolves and anything else that lives where people do?
Think about it for a minute. I will pick on massachusetts, only because it is the only other state I really know well. Much of it is sterile. Heck, hardly even have insects. I remember driving to the reservoir to fish with my dad as a kid. In ten minutes the windshield was full of dead bugs. Not anymore. Lucky if one bug gets sacrificed. Bats are gone. I notice that there are a fraction of the birds. Nobody really cares. And it has no impact on anyone's life. No bugs is a good thing right? All we need really are a bunch of breweries, bars and restaurants. It is the modern day jungle.
We don't need wildlife. We don't use them for food anymore. If anything, they're pests. Deer eat our gardens. Coyotes eat our pets.
During the last 4 billion years we have had plenty of mass extinctions. Maybe we are part of the process of the next one.
I love the outdoors. I love animals. But much of that is due to the fact that I love to hunt. I certainly don't need to hunt. I can get what I need from the grocery store. Maybe these pesky animals everywhere and open lands need to make way for the next stage of the planet's life where there is nothing left but humans.
Maybe I'm actually the problem. I'm holding onto this nostalgic idea that for some reason is still lingering in my dna. The modern man doesn't hunt. He doesn't live in nature. He does not cherish his tools to harvest animals.
Deer have no place in Worcester or Boston. Why should we have them anywhere in between?
I too just wrapped up watching Life on our Planet last night. To your basic broad question, I would side on it not mattering to planet earth. Earth as far as we know has experienced 5 mass extinctions. The link posted about a possible 6th one currently happening and it is probably correct.Well that, and I just finished watching Life on our Planet on Netflix. Does it really matter if we wipe out all the deer, elk, wolves and anything else that lives where people do?
I'm from CT. The hunting is awesome, and MA is full of turkey and big bucks ! What is that guy smoking?It's a great thread topic but man do people over look the urban areas/urban interface for wildlife. I don't have pics but I watched bald eagles fishing in the seaport and saw a peregrine outside MGH.
and yeah all of these were taken in here over the course of 2 years.
View attachment 306105
I think there aren't many western cities you could get ducks, turkey, deer, and pheasant on public land within 45 min of downtown.
View attachment 306100
View attachment 306101
View attachment 306102
View attachment 306103