Whitetails pressuring muleys

Oak

Expert
Joined
Dec 23, 2000
Messages
16,062
Location
Colorado
Increase in whitetail deer worries wildlife officials
By Charlie Meyers / Denver Post columnist


The time-worn map that adorns a wall at the Fort Collins office of the Colorado Division of Wildlife is notable for historic insights into the agency as it existed more than 60 years ago.

In displaying the relative simplicity of the organization and its facilities in the 1930s, the map speaks volumes about the evolution of a wildlife agency whose reach has grown exponentially.

The old map also illustrates another trend, one that ranks as a mounting concern for big-game managers. Two small dots - one in the extreme southeast corner of the state, another where the Arkansas River meets the Kansas border - denote the only known presence of whitetail deer in the state.

Today's chart shows a far different picture. Expanding at an accelerated rate, whitetails now are common throughout Colorado's eastern plains and also have made a significant incursion west of the Continental Divide.

"There's been quite an expansion. People are picking them up all over the Western Slope," said Gary Miller, DOW's mammal research leader.

A decade ago, two Denver-area anglers were shocked to see two whitetail does on a visit to Rams Horn Lake, in the Flat Tops west of Yampa.

In the years since, reports of whitetails in western Colorado have become almost commonplace as well as cause for alarm. The Colorado Wildlife Commission listed the expansion of whitetails west of Interstate 25 among its prime concerns in the strategic plan released in 2002.

The commission this year also addressed the growing numbers of whitetail deer on the eastern plains by issuing permits for special hunts exclusively for that species.

"We wanted to keep whitetails from expanding into what had been mule deer territory on the plains without increasing harvest on mule deer," explained Janet George, senior terrestrial biologist for DOW's Northeast Region.

George speculated that the success of the Conservation Reserve Program, with its tall grasses and improved forage, proved particularly beneficial to plains whitetail. But it's the movement into traditional mule deer range in the high country that concerns biologists already worried over a continuing malaise among mule deer and the more recent spread of chronic wasting disease.

John Ellenberger, state big-game manager, reports a sighting two years ago, not far from his Grand Junction office. Other evidence has emerged from locations around Meeker and Craig, as well as long-standing populations in North Park and Middle Park.

The North Park incursion can be explained as part of a continuing migration up the North Platte River drainage; stream corridors are common highways for many animal species. But the presence of whitetails in the Flat Tops and other mountain areas remain more of a mystery.

George, who previously worked as a biologist just west of Denver, reports that a hunter bagged a whitetail deer last year in Golden Gate Canyon. She further recalls seeing a doe with two fawns five or six years ago around Empire. Others have been sighted in South Park near Jefferson.

The spread of whitetail deer in Colorado appears part of a nationwide trend that alarms wildlife managers in many eastern locations. Deer are so numerous in Alabama that hunters are allowed one antlered deer per day during a statewide season that extends nearly two months. Over parts of the state, a doe also may be added to that daily bag.

On a recent visit to western Montana, this writer found whitetail deer thick as rabbits in river bottom thickets. Locals complained frequently of having too many deer.

Here, as in almost every other place along that expanding margin where whitetails and mulies lock horns, whitetails have gained the upper hoof. The reason, Miller revealed, lies in an inherent reproductive advantage.

"Whitetails generally breed at an earlier age and, under good conditions, have a higher rate of twins," he said.

A furtive nature, evidenced by a proclivity for thick cover, also makes whitetails less susceptible to hunting pressure.

Colorado wildlife managers might be surprised at what a comparative survey of today's whitetail population might show, were it superimposed on that old map from the 1930s. But the real shocker might be what it will look like another 60 years from now.
http://www.denverpost.com/Stories/0,1413,36~110~1487501,00.html

Oak
 
I saw White tails at around the 7000 foot level last year in the hills above Anaconda...
They were a long way from any creek bottom, or any thing one would think that they would use for food!!!
smile.gif
 
Fragmentation of habitat and urbanization favors whitetails over muleys. Add that to the fact that whitetails have been here MUCH longer and therefore can inhabit a wider amount of terrain. They are great adapters.

Fred Bear was fond of saying that if you could ever teach a whitetail to climb mountains like the wild sheep or goats that it would be nearly impossible to kill one with a bow!!!
 
I also seem to remember reading that mule deer does will accept a whitetail buck to breed with, while whitetail does generally do not breed with mule deer bucks. It has to do with the buck's rut behavior. This favors the hybredization (Is that a word?) of the muley into a whitetail type.
 
The cross breeds are sterile.. They display some awsome racks, but the bullets are all duds.. The largest threat to the welfare of the Mule Deer is the mule deer itself. It is by and large and anti social animal with other species. A study in Oregon some years ago, aimed at tracking Elk and documenting how they intermingled with Mule deer found that as man encroached into the forest, the Elk moved away from the roads. The mule deer moved toward the roads. Not in search of man, but to avoid contact with elk. Only rarely will you see mule deer grazing, interspersed with other animals. They be in proximity, but not mingled. Mulies tend to keep to them selves. This is especially true of old mulie bucks.
So I am sure that as the white tail move in and take over what until now has been mule deer habitat, we will see mule deer either move to new locations or simply become fewer and fewer until ........

cool.gif
 
Not all of the crosses are sterile, according to my brother, a USF&W biologist:

"Mule deer, as a species, evolved from a single crossing of a west coast blacktail with a female Texas whitetail during one of the warm periods between the ice ages. This crossing took place in the Rockies/Four Corners area based upon DNA work done a few years ago.

"The blacktail itself was a whitetail that got to the west coast and evolved separately on the west coast after being isolated by later ice sheets and glaciers.

"I do remember that stotting (that peculiar bouncing run of mule deer) has been found in mulies that are 7/8 mule deer but not in ones that are 3/4 mule deer. Therefore, at least some are fertile. No easy answer, but there rarely is in Nature."

So there you have it...but hey - it's just what he does for a living and years of post-graduate and field work.
wink.gif
 
Thanks CH, as I said I didn't know.

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR> So I am sure that as the white tail move in and take over what until now has been mule deer habitat, we will see mule deer either move to new locations or simply become fewer and fewer until ........ <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>Dan- Are you saying that whitetails are invading muley habitat or that the habitat is no longer as suitable for muleys as it is for whitetails? IMO, the later scenario is probably a better choice. Because if the first were true, why did it happen sometime in the last 15,000yrs (last ice age)?
 
Back
Top