EastTNHunter
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2018
- Messages
- 1,779
It’s a bad look for sure
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It’s a bad look for sure
As someone unfortunately familiar with the situation in the Ruby I can shed a little light on the situation at hand. The prevalence being observed is due to the extreme density of whitetail deer in the valley bottoms and the further congregation of animals during winter months. Once prevalence breaks the double digits and populations remain high the disease will seemingly spread exponentially. "Density will drive prevalence, until prevalence drives density." This disease is going to continue to spread in areas of extreme deer density up and down the river bottoms in the state.Certainly possible. Definitely hard to tease these things out, especially when we’re dealing with wild populations on the landscape where it’s impossible to control, or even identify, all the possible variables at work. I guess it’s places like the Ruby that give me pause when it comes to the predator effects. I believe there is a full complement of large carnivores on the landscape in and around that area, and CWD prevalence has jumped to upwards of 75% or something ridiculously high. Why? Are predators not targeting them? Does the high proportion of private land ownership interfere with predators’ effectiveness? Is transmission occurring at such a rate that predation can’t make an appreciable difference? Could it, under different conditions? Is there something else entirely going on?
Just thinking out loud again. I am nowhere near familiar enough with the specifics over there to make any guesses and might well be way off base. But I find these kinds of questions interesting to mull around.
That's probably true. BUT and it's a big BUT it will be the ones who look at the data without the bias being told by those in that community at large. It will be ones who look at it objectively and try to look at it from a different perspective. No different then COVID it was the doctors who looked at the data and found ways to help people but didn't tow the mainstream line that there was nothing really that could help people other then a new experimental injection.But if there is a solution out of this CWD mess, I would bet money that people with those “high level degrees” will be the ones that find it.
From the article:So many CWD threads, I wasn’t sure where to put this article from this morning. If for no other reason, read it for the compelling sentence, “Montana, for example, is famous for its deer hunting.”
Possibility of wildlife-to-human crossover heightens concern about chronic wasting disease
Read that this morning.So many CWD threads, I wasn’t sure where to put this article from this morning. If for no other reason, read it for the compelling sentence, “Montana, for example, is famous for its deer hunting.”
Possibility of wildlife-to-human crossover heightens concern about chronic wasting disease