Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
C is definitely real. Most people I know work from home and one of the reasons they don't want to go into the office is because they can get all their work done in 5-6 hours at home and don't want to just do busy work for a few hours a day in the office.This is an interesting discussion.
Three things that concern me about the work-from-home revolution are A) downward salary pressure once market conditions change in favor of employers, B) what if “home” isn’t in the US? and C) if these jobs can be accomplished in just a few hours a day, companies may realize they have too many employees doing too little.
where are YOU getting your clear from ?? closer to $6+ in these parts$4.75 for non ethanol premium for the lawn mower on Saturday. $4.99 for #2 diesel for the firewood hauler on Friday.
Agreed, the 8 hour work day should be challenged.C is definitely real. Most people I know work from home and one of the reasons they don't want to go into the office is because they can get all their work done in 5-6 hours at home and don't want to just do busy work for a few hours a day in the office.
That's one way to look at it. There are others. If those employees really want flexibility they should just work for themselves, but they don't want that responsibility.i think you're overthinking it.
it's a quality of life thing.
employee's want higher quality of life. employers want things to remain as they always have been. ergo the tension.
really not much more complicated than that.
That's one way to look at it. There are others. If those employees really want flexibility they should just work for themselves, but they don't want that responsibility.
What you see with people is they want the flexibility of being their own boss, flexibility, good pay, but they really don't want the responsibility or work hours involved with being self employed.
This is why Uber, Grub Hub, etc are so popular because people get the feeling of working for themselves, the flexibility, etc, but they can just turn the app off when they don't want the responsibility.
That's also what you see going on now. Lots of folks who want to be paid a full time wage but in reality only want to do a few hours of work from home each day so they can do whatever they want the rest of the day while the company pays them. They don't want the responsibility or long work hours, they just want the $. This is great if folks can find a small business who is willing to provide that kind of job flexibility, its' their $ so they can spend it how they want. But when it's a government job it's 'a different story as those are taxpayers dollars being wasted. In those situations where a job only requires a few hours of work there should likely be adjustments made so the jobs are full time to protect the taxpayers interest.
People will do the least amount of work possible in many cases. Finding those jobs where someone can do a few hours of work from home but still be paid as a full time employee are going to be what folks want. The challenge there is can an employer get enough value out of 2-3 hours of work to pay someone a full time wage. There may be people who can provide full time value for the company working 2-3 hours, but the reality is most people don't have the skills to bring $100-$200+ per hour of value to the company for that to pencil out.
I think most employees forget that the company has to be making enough $ from their work to pay them and still cover all the other costs of running a business and make a profit.
Conoco station in Hamilton, MTwhere are YOU getting your clear from ?? closer to $6+ in these parts
C is definitely real. Most people I know work from home and one of the reasons they don't want to go into the office is because they can get all their work done in 5-6 hours at home and don't want to just do busy work for a few hours a day in the office.
Thanks for proving my point. As you said people don't want risk, they don't' want to work full time, they don't' want responsibility, they just want the $. Some may consider that lazy.no. i kinda just feel like you're looking at it through a biased lense of "people are lazy."
i would argue that if people want flexibility they should work for someone else, not themselves. i hardly know anyone with less free time than those i've met/know who start/own their own businesses. higher risk too, people typically don't want more risk.
it's the boomer mentality of "this is the way we've always done it."
when it becomes clear that certain paradigms are wasteful and actually counterproductive to society they need to change. and those that have been a part of the paradigm the longest are the most resistant to a new one. when millenials are of boomer age alot of us will be making the same mistake. i just hope i'm smart enough at the time to shut up and get out of the way of the younger, smarter, more ambitious ones.
gotta lose the bias and talk about it for what it is. has nothing to do with laziness.
in any event 90% of employees have only been bringing 4-6 hours of work to the table for decades, many decades. 4-6 hours at home or 4-6 hours at the office, tomayto/tomahto
grubhub and uber are fools errands FWIW. i feel sorry for anyone who gets duped into that thnking they'll be their own boss and do anything but lose money and time.
You're old school...that model isn't going to work for the modern worker.Thanks for proving my point. As you said people don't want risk, they don't' want to work full time, they don't' want responsibility, they just want the $. Some may consider that lazy.
Thanks for proving my point. As you said people don't want risk, they don't' want to work full time, they don't' want responsibility, they just want the $. Some may consider that lazy.
This outside my expertise, but I believe we domestically produce the oil that is used to make gasoline. The oil from keystone or that which we important is necessary to run the refinery but not create gasoline.
no. i kinda just feel like you're looking at it through a biased lense of "people are lazy."
i would argue that if people want flexibility they should work for someone else, not themselves. i hardly know anyone with less free time than those i've met/know who start/own their own businesses. higher risk too, people typically don't want more risk.
it's the boomer mentality of "this is the way we've always done it."
when it becomes clear that certain paradigms are wasteful and actually counterproductive to society they need to change. and those that have been a part of the paradigm the longest are the most resistant to a new one. when millenials are of boomer age alot of us will be making the same mistake. i just hope i'm smart enough at the time to shut up and get out of the way of the younger, smarter, more ambitious ones.
gotta lose the bias and talk about it for what it is. has nothing to do with laziness.
in any event 90% of employees have only been bringing 4-6 hours of work to the table for decades, many decades. 4-6 hours at home or 4-6 hours at the office, tomayto/tomahto
grubhub and uber are fools errands FWIW. i feel sorry for anyone who gets duped into that thnking they'll be their own boss and do anything but lose money and time.
i would argue that if people want flexibility they should work for someone else, not themselves. i hardly know anyone with less free time than those i've met/know who start/own their own businesses. higher risk too, people typically don't want more risk.